Mednet Logo

Abstract

Study design

Systematic review and modified Delphi technique.

Objective

To use an evidence-based medicine process using the best available literature and expert opinion consensus to develop a comprehensive classification system to diagnose neoplastic spinal instability.

Summary of background data

Spinal instability is poorly defined in the literature and presently there is a lack of guidelines available to aid in defining the degree of spinal instability in the setting of neoplastic spinal disease. The concept of spinal instability remains important in the clinical decision-making process for patients with spine tumors.

Methods

We have integrated the evidence provided by systematic reviews through a modified Delphi technique to generate a consensus of best evidence and expert opinion to develop a classification system to define neoplastic spinal instability.

Results

A comprehensive classification system based on patient symptoms and radiographic criteria of the spine was developed to aid in predicting spine stability of neoplastic lesions. The classification system includes global spinal location of the tumor, type and presence of pain, bone lesion quality, spinal alignment, extent of vertebral body collapse, and posterolateral spinal element involvement. Qualitative scores were assigned based on relative importance of particular factors gleaned from the literature and refined by expert consensus.

Conclusion

The Spine Instability Neoplastic Score is a comprehensive classification system with content validity that can guide clinicians in identifying when patients with neoplastic disease of the spine may benefit from surgical consultation. It can also aid surgeons in assessing the key components of spinal instability due to neoplasia and may become a prognostic tool for surgical decision-making when put in context with other key elements such as neurologic symptoms, extent of disease, prognosis, patient health factors, oncologic subtype, and radiosensitivity of the tumor.

Related Questions

For epidural spinal cord compression in good-performance/prognosis patients who are otherwise inoperable, do you still aim for 30 Gy in 10 fractions, or are you fine with 20 Gy in 5 fractions?

5
3 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Harvard Radiation Oncology Program

In general, if prognosis is good (e.g., greater than roughly 6-12 months), 30 Gy in 10 fractions is preferred, given a lesser risk of recurrence with epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC) as compared to lower dose regimens such as 4 Gy x 5 in the longer term (e.g., from Rades et al., PMID 15908648...

Do you take any special precautions when treating cervical spine metastases?

1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · University of Washington School of Medicine

For each spine met case, it's important to determine whether it's a surgical or radiotherapy case. Spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) and Bilsky grade (epidural cord compression) are two important parameters to consider. If SINS is 6 or below and if Bilsky grade is 1c or below, surgical inte...

Does Neurosurgery need to be consulted for assessment of spinal stability in patients with cervical spine mets prior to starting RT?

1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · VA New Jersey Healthcare System - East Orange campus.

To address the first question, for me personally, I would feel uncomfortable not including neurosurgery. Fortunately, there has been good work in this area by the Spinal Oncology Study group to help clinically clarify the matter. That is, these folks in 2010, developed a so-called "Spinal Instabilit...