Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2016-07-01
Absolute Benefit of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapies for Premenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early Breast Cancer: TEXT and SOFT Trials.
Abstract
Purpose
Risk of recurrence is the primary consideration in breast cancer adjuvant therapy recommendations. The TEXT (Tamoxifen and Exemestane Trial) and SOFT (Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial) trials investigated adjuvant endocrine therapies for premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, testing exemestane plus ovarian function suppression (OFS), tamoxifen plus OFS, and tamoxifen alone. We examined absolute treatment effect across a continuum of recurrence risk to individualize endocrine therapy decision making for premenopausal women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -negative disease.
Patients and methods
The TEXT and SOFT hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative analysis population included 4,891 women. The end point was breast cancer-free interval (BCFI), defined as time from random assignment to first occurrence of invasive locoregional, distant, or contralateral breast cancer. A continuous, composite measure of recurrence risk for each patient was determined from a Cox model incorporating age, nodal status, tumor size and grade, and estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and Ki-67 expression levels. Subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot methodology revealed differential treatment effects on 5-year BCFI according to composite risk.
Results
SOFT patients who remained premenopausal after chemotherapy experienced absolute improvement of 5% or more in 5-year BCFI with exemestane plus OFS versus tamoxifen plus OFS or tamoxifen alone, reaching 10% to 15% at intermediate to high composite risk; the benefit of tamoxifen plus OFS versus tamoxifen alone was apparent at the highest composite risk. The SOFT no-chemotherapy cohort-for whom composite risk was lowest on average-did well with all endocrine therapies. For TEXT patients, the benefit of exemestane plus OFS versus tamoxifen plus OFS in 5-year BCFI ranged from 5% to 15%; patients not receiving chemotherapy and with lowest composite risk did well with both treatments.
Conclusion
Premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative disease and high recurrence risk, as defined by clinicopathologic characteristics, may experience improvement of 10% to 15% in 5-year BCFI with exemestane plus OFS versus tamoxifen alone. An improvement of at least 5% may be achieved for women at intermediate risk, and improvement is minimal for those at lowest risk.
Related Questions
Which adjuvant chemotherapy regimen would you recommend for a peri-menopausal woman with synchronous stage IA primary breast tumors, one that is ER+HER2+ and the second ER+HER2-?
I would treat the patient with paclitaxel 80mg/m2 x 12 weeks plus trastuzumab for a year (Tolaney et al., Clin Oncol 2019). The more difficult question is the optimal anti-estrogen therapy: tamoxifen (TAM), TAM + ovarian suppression (OS), or aromatase inhibitor (AI) + OS. This is because the SOFT an...
What is your approach to adjuvant endocrine therapy in high-risk premenopausal women with ER/PR+ Her2+ breast cancer?
There are no large scale modern era assessing the role of adjuvant hormonal therapy in patients with HER2+ and hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Data from metastatic trials and cohort studies do suggest that there is an interaction with concurrent hormonal and HER2-targeted therapy and the tw...
In women in whom you suspect chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea and are required to start an AI, what is your strategy with regard to ovarian suppression?
For patients who were premenopausal at the time of breast cancer diagnosis (or shortly before) and who cease menses either spontaneously or due to chemotherapy, many will continue to have ovarian production of estrogen without periods, or resume periods for up to 2 years (and sometimes after even lo...