J Clin Oncol 2022 Aug 30
Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab in Previously Untreated Advanced Urothelial Cancer.
Abstract
Background
Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy remains the standard of care for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC); however, toxicity is substantial, responses are rarely durable, and many la/mUC patients are ineligible. Enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab have each shown a survival benefit versus chemotherapy in UC, are not restricted by cisplatin eligibility, and warrant investigation as a first-line (1L) combination therapy in patients ineligible for cisplatin.
Methods
In this ongoing Phase 1b/2, multicenter, open-label study, 1L cisplatin-ineligible patients with la/mUC received enfortumab vedotin 1.25 mg/kg (Days 1 and 8) and pembrolizumab 200 mg (Day 1) intravenously in 3-week cycles. The primary endpoint was safety. Key secondary endpoints included confirmed objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS).
Results
Forty-five patients received enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were peripheral sensory neuropathy (55.6%), fatigue (51.1%), and alopecia (48.9%). Twenty-nine patients (64.4%) had grade 3 or higher TRAEs; the most common were increased lipase (17.8%), maculopapular rash (11.1%), and fatigue (11.1%). One death (2.2%) was classified as a TRAE. Confirmed ORR after a median of 9 cycles was 73.3% with a 15.6% complete response rate. Median DOR and median OS were 25.6 months and 26.1 months, respectively.
Conclusions
Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab showed a manageable safety profile. Most patients experienced tumor shrinkage. The median DOR and median OS exceeding 2 years in a cisplatin-ineligible patient population make this a promising combination currently under investigation in a Phase 3 study (NCT04223856).(Funded by Astellas Pharma US, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, and Seagen Inc; EV-103/KN-869 ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03288545).
Related Questions
When will you recommend enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma for cisplatin-ineligible patients?
This is a timely question given the US FDA approval of the pembro/EV combination on 4/3/2023. Currently, the label is for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who are ineligible for cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. There are a variety of definitions for cisplatin ineli...
Are there instances where you would offer erdafitinib instead of avelumab for maintenance therapy for FGFR3 mutated metastatic bladder cancer after stable disease on cisplatin/gemcitabine?
The short answer is 'no'. There are no data for supporting FGFR inhibition in a maintenance first-line setting for those with stable or responding disease on platinum-based chemotherapy and FGFR2/3 activating alterations. There are contrasting data suggesting that the activity of PD1/L1 inhibitors m...