J Clin Oncol 2018 Aug 28
Hydroxycarbamide Plus Aspirin Versus Aspirin Alone in Patients With Essential Thrombocythemia Age 40 to 59 Years Without High-Risk Features.
Abstract
Purpose
Cytoreductive therapy is beneficial in patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) at high risk of thrombosis. However, its value in those lacking high-risk features remains unknown. This open-label, randomized trial compared hydroxycarbamide plus aspirin with aspirin alone in patients with ET age 40 to 59 years and without high-risk factors or extreme thrombocytosis.
Patients and methods
Patients were age 40 to 59 years and lacked a history of ischemia, thrombosis, embolism, hemorrhage, extreme thrombocytosis (platelet count ≥ 1,500 × 109/L), hypertension, or diabetes requiring therapy. In all, 382 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to hydroxycarbamide plus aspirin or aspirin alone. The composite primary end point was time to arterial or venous thrombosis, serious hemorrhage, or death from vascular causes. Secondary end points were time to first arterial or venous thrombosis, first serious hemorrhage, death, incidence of transformation, and patient-reported quality of life.
Results
After a median follow-up of 73 months and a total follow-up of 2,373 patient-years, there was no significant difference between the arms in the likelihood of patients reaching the primary end point (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.42 to 2.25; P = 1.0). The incidence of significant vascular events was low, at 0.93 per 100 patient-years (95% CI, 0.61 to 1.41). There were also no differences in overall survival; in the composite end point of transformation to myelofibrosis, acute myeloid leukemia, or myelodysplasia; in adverse events; or in patient-reported quality of life.
Conclusion
In patients with ET age 40 to 59 years and lacking high-risk factors for thrombosis or extreme thrombocytosis, preemptive addition of hydroxycarbamide to aspirin did not reduce vascular events, myelofibrotic transformation, or leukemic transformation. Patients age 40 to 59 years without other clinical indications for treatment (such as previous thrombosis or hemorrhage) who have a platelet count < 1,500 × 109/L should not receive cytoreductive therapy.
Related Questions
In patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) receiving hydroxyurea for cytoreduction who develop anemia — whether hydroxyurea-induced or from a concurrent etiology such as CKD — would you use ESAs?
This is an important question. Patients with ET should not have anemia related to the ET itself. Thus, assessing the etiology of the anemia is very important. If the anemia is from hydroxyurea, the first step is to lower the dose of the hydroxyurea. Controlling platelets should not come at the expen...
Does potential longterm risk for leukemia influence your decision for using hydroxyurea in young patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms?
Thanks for the great question. I think there is a range of passionate options about the matter, which is sure to stir up debate. One can infer by the number of opinions on the topic, the data is limited (where data lacks, opinions abound). So here is my take: It does not influence my decision making...