Mednet Logo

Abstract

Purpose

This multicentre, prospective, randomised-controlled trial compared efficacy and toxicity of differing radiotherapy doses in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

Patients and methods

Patients with any histological subtype of NHL, requiring radiotherapy for local disease control, whether radical, consolidative or palliative, were included. Three hundred and sixty one sites of indolent NHL (predominantly follicular NHL and marginal zone lymphoma) were randomised to receive 40-45Gy in 20-23 fractions or 24Gy in 12 fractions. Six hundred and forty sites of aggressive NHL (predominantly diffuse large B cell lymphoma as part of combined-modality therapy) were randomised to receive 40-45Gy in 20-23 fractions or 30Gy in 15 fractions. Patients with all stages of disease, having first-line and subsequent therapies were included; first presentations of early-stage disease predominated.

Results

There was no difference in overall response rate (ORR) between standard and lower-dose arms. In the indolent group, ORR was 93% and 92%, respectively, (p=0.72); in the aggressive group, ORR was 91% in both arms (p=0.87). With a median follow-up of 5.6years, there was no significant difference detected in the rate of within-radiation field progression (HR=1.09, 95%CI=0.76-1.56, p=0.64 in the indolent group; HR=0.98, 95%CI=0.68-1.4, p=0.89 in the aggressive group). There was also no significant difference detected in the progression free or overall survival. There was a trend for reduced toxicities in the low-dose arms; only the reduction in reported erythema reached significance.

Conclusion

In a large, randomised trial, there was no loss of efficacy associated with radiotherapy doses of 24Gy in indolent NHL and 30Gy in aggressive NHL, compared with previous standard doses of 40-45Gy.

Related Questions

How would you approach a fit older (>70 years) with grade I-II, bulky, follicular lymphoma causing ureteral obstruction and renal failure?

2 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York

You could also consider focal radiotherapy as we know follicular lymphoma is often very radiosensitive (and can respond quickly to RT). Depending on the trajectory of the AKI and dysfunction, I would discuss with my urology colleagues to see if there is any role for ureteral stenting to see if kidne...

What is your approach for bulky stage I primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma in a patient with a positive post-chemotherapy PET-CT (residual mass and Deauville 5)?

2
2 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey

Interpreting end-of-treatment PET in PMBL can be tricky. False positives here are very common! Fake-outs include thymic rebound masquerading as refractory disease; avidity at rim (which is almost always biopsy-neg); or residual avidity throughout residual mass which again can be biopsy negative. I w...

What volume and dose would you use for a Stage I MALT lymphoma of the lung?

2 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · University of Colorado School of Medicine

MALT lymphomas are highly radiosensitive. Curative standard doses are 24 Gy in 12 fractions and 30 Gy in 20 fractions. The latter and slower dose fractionation (30 Gy in 20) is best used specifically in the setting of stage IAE Gastric MALT - a unique site with significant risk of radiation induced ...