New: NCI-funded clinical trial search
Mednet Logo

Abstract

Purpose

Multifraction (MF) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) purportedly reduces radionecrosis risk over single-fraction (SF) SRS in the treatment of large brain metastases. The purpose of the current work is to compare local control (LC) and radionecrosis rates of SF-SRS and MF-SRS in the definitive (SF-SRSD and MF-SRSD) and postoperative (SF-SRSP and MF-SRSP) settings.

Methods and materials

Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, Study Design/Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were used to select articles in which patients had "large" brain metastases (Group A: 4-14 cm3, or about 2-3 cm in diameter; Group B: >14 cm3, or about >3 cm in diameter); 1-year LC and/or rates of radionecrosis were reported; radiosurgery was administered definitively or postoperatively. Random effects meta-analyses using fractionation scheme and size as covariates were conducted. Meta-regression and Wald-type tests were used to determine the effect of increasing tumor size and fractionation on the summary estimate, where the null hypothesis was rejected for P < .05.

Results

Twenty-four studies were included, published between 2008 and 2017, with 1887 brain metastases. LC random effects estimate at 1 year was 77.6% for Group A/SF-SRSD and 92.9% for Group A/MF-SRSD (P = .18). LC random effects estimate at 1 year was 77.1% for Group B/SF-SRSD and 79.2% for Group B/MF-SRSD (P = .76). LC random effects estimate at 1 year was 62.4% for Group B/SF-SRSP and 85.7% for Group B/MF-SRSP (P = .13). Radionecrosis incidence random effects estimate was 23.1% for Group A/SF-SRSD and 7.3% for Group A/MF-SRSD (P = .003). Radionecrosis incidence random effects estimate was 11.7% for Group B/SF-SRSD and 6.5% for Group B/MF-SRSD (P = .29). Radionecrosis incidence random effects estimate was 7.3% for Group B/SF-SRSP and 7.5% for Group B/MF-SRSP (P = .85). Metaregression assessing 1-year LC and radionecrosis as a continuous function of increasing tumor volume was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Treatment for large brain metastases with MF-SRS regimens may offer a relative reduction of radionecrosis while maintaining or improving relative rates of 1-year LC compared with SF-SRS. These findings are hypothesis-generating and require validation by ongoing and planned prospective clinical trials.

Related Questions

What is your preferred fSRS dose/fractionation for large brain metastases?

3
5 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Columbia University Irving Medical Center

For large intact brain metastases, my preferred fSRS dose/fractionation would be 27 Gy in 3 daily fractions. There are retrospective studies showing 1-yr local control rates of 91% using 27 Gy in 3 daily fractions vs 77% using single fraction SRS for large intact brain metastases &gt; 2 cm (Minniti et ...

What is the optimal schedule for fractionated SRS treatment of CNS tumors?

2
3 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · University of Missouri at Columbia, Ellis Fischel Cancer Cener

I don't think there is one ideal dose/fraction schedule. Doses should be individualized for your institution, including factors such as immobilization, set up, and margins. There are published data on ranges of SRT.For larger tumors, typically defined as 2 cm to up to 3-4 cm I would favor 24-27 Gy i...