New: NCI-funded clinical trial search
Mednet Logo

Abstract

Background

The poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) inhibitor talazoparib has shown antitumor activity in patients with advanced breast cancer and germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 ( BRCA1/2).

Methods

We conducted a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial in which patients with advanced breast cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation were assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive talazoparib (1 mg once daily) or standard single-agent therapy of the physician's choice (capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine in continuous 21-day cycles). The primary end point was progression-free survival, which was assessed by blinded independent central review.

Results

Of the 431 patients who underwent randomization, 287 were assigned to receive talazoparib and 144 were assigned to receive standard therapy. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the talazoparib group than in the standard-therapy group (8.6 months vs. 5.6 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.71; P<0.001). The interim median hazard ratio for death was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.55 to 1.06; P=0.11 [57% of projected events]). The objective response rate was higher in the talazoparib group than in the standard-therapy group (62.6% vs. 27.2%; odds ratio, 5.0; 95% CI, 2.9 to 8.8; P<0.001). Hematologic grade 3-4 adverse events (primarily anemia) occurred in 55% of the patients who received talazoparib and in 38% of the patients who received standard therapy; nonhematologic grade 3 adverse events occurred in 32% and 38% of the patients, respectively. Patient-reported outcomes favored talazoparib; significant overall improvements and significant delays in the time to clinically meaningful deterioration according to both the global health status-quality-of-life and breast symptoms scales were observed.

Conclusions

Among patients with advanced breast cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation, single-agent talazoparib provided a significant benefit over standard chemotherapy with respect to progression-free survival. Patient-reported outcomes were superior with talazoparib. (Funded by Medivation [Pfizer]; EMBRACA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01945775 .).

Related Questions

What factors impact your choice of first line therapy for PDL1-negative metastatic TNBC?

4 Answers

Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Emory University School of Medicine

The first-line treatment landscape for PD-L1-negative metastatic TNBC has been transformed by ASCENT-03 and TROPION-Breast02. ASCENT-03 showed improved median PFS with sacituzumab govitecan compared with chemotherapy, while TROPION-Breast02 showed improved PFS with datopotamab deruxtecan and also de...

Would you recommend olaparib for a patient with germline BRCA1 mutation and HER2+ metastatic breast cancer who has progressed through multiple lines of HER2-directed therapy including trastuzumab deruxtecan?

5
4 Answers

Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

Although OlympiAD (Robson et al., PMID 28578601) and EMBRACA (Litton et al., PMID 30110579) studied olaparib and talazoparib in HER2negative gBRCA mutant metastatic breast cancer, the activity is based on the mechanism of synthetic lethality in BRCA deficient tumors. Thus, it is reasonable to think ...

In patients who receive neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and chemotherapy for TNBC, how will you manage adjuvant treatment if they have a germline BRCA mutation?

9
5 Answers

Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Ohio State University

For patients with clinically high risk early TNBC and germline PV in BRCA 1 or 2 undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy along with pembrolizumab, the course of adjuvant therapy will depend on pathologic response at surgery.For those with pCR - I would continue adjuvant pembrolizumab for patients who ar...

How would you manage a patient with high risk triple negative breast cancer with metastatic disease after recent adjuvant AC-T?

1 Answers

Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida

If she relapsed within 12 months of her adjuvant paclitaxel, then I would consider her TNBC taxane resistant. These patients weren't enrolled in Impassion130 and many first line trials exclude patients with short DFI. If a trial is available, consider it whenever possible. I would do BRCA germline t...