J Clin Oncol 2020 Oct 29
TBCRC 048: Phase II Study of Olaparib for Metastatic Breast Cancer and Mutations in Homologous Recombination-Related Genes.   
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE
Olaparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor (PARPi), is approved for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in germline (g)/ mutation carriers. Olaparib Expanded, an investigator-initiated, phase II study, assessed olaparib response in patients with MBC with somatic (s)/ mutations or g/s mutations in homologous recombination (HR)-related genes other than 2.
METHODS
Eligible patients had MBC with measurable disease and germline mutations in non-/ HR-related genes (cohort 1) or somatic mutations in these genes or / (cohort 2). Prior PARPi, platinum-refractory disease, or progression on more than two chemotherapy regimens (metastatic setting) was not allowed. Patients received olaparib 300 mg orally twice a day until progression. A single-arm, two-stage design was used. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); the null hypothesis (≤ 5% ORR) would be rejected within each cohort if there were four or more responses in 27 patients. Secondary endpoints included clinical benefit rate and progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS
Fifty-four patients enrolled. Seventy-six percent had estrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative disease. Eighty-seven percent had mutations in s/, or . In cohort 1, ORR was 33% (90% CI, 19% to 51%) and in cohort 2, 31% (90% CI, 15% to 49%). Confirmed responses were seen only with g (ORR, 82%) and s/ (ORR, 50%) mutations. Median PFS was 13.3 months (90% CI, 12 months to not available/computable [NA]) for g and 6.3 months (90% CI, 4.4 months to NA) for s/ mutation carriers. No responses were observed with or mutations alone.
CONCLUSION
PARP inhibition is an effective treatment for patients with MBC and g or s/ mutations, significantly expanding the population of patients with breast cancer likely to benefit from PARPi beyond g/ mutation carriers. These results emphasize the value of molecular characterization for treatment decisions in MBC.

Related Questions


Do you perceive a difference between somatic vs germline BRCA mutations? 

What about a higher penetrance PV such as PALB2? See JCO OGR 8/2021 by @Mark E. Robson discussing management of non-BRCA pathogenic va...

If yes, where in sequence would you use it?