Mednet Logo
CommunityMedical Oncology

Do you find DFS as defined in POTOMAC a clinically meaningful endpoint for high-risk NMIBC, given that low-grade recurrences manageable with repeat TURBT would have qualified as events?

Community PollStarted

Is the POTOMAC DFS benefit sufficient to adopt durvalumab plus BCG routinely for high-risk NMIBC in your practice?

13 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

2 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles
Answered on

In my opinion, in patients with such an early stage of disease such as NMIBC, Disease-free survival (DFS) is a meaningful endpoint. Low-grade recurrences were excluded, and therefore, the clinically meaningful endpoints were preserved.

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Urology · University of Washington School of Medicine
Answered on

In POTOMAC, the primary endpoint was disease-free survival as measured by a high-risk NMIBC recurrence or progression to muscle-invasive disease. There was a secondary outcome of any disease-free survival that included the occurrence of low-grade recurrences, but that was a secondary outcome. The pr...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer