Do you consider tumor mutation burden as a possible biomarker for response to immune checkpoint therapy in the second line setting for cervical cancer?
According to NCCN guidelines, pembrolizumab could be used as a second line therapy for tumors that are PDL1 positive, can be categorized as MSI-high (high microsatellite instability), or are deficiency in mismatch repair (Le DT, et al. Mismatch repair deficiency predicts response of solid tumors to PD-1 blockade. Science. 357: 409-413 (2017); Frenel JS, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Pembrolizumab in Advanced, Programmed Death Ligand 1-Positive Cervical Cancer: Results from the Phase Ib KEYNOTE-028 Trial. J Clin Oncol. 35: 4035-4041 (2017); Chung HC, et al. Pembrolizumab treatment of advanced cervical cancer: Updated results from the phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study [abstract]. J Clin Oncol 36 (2018)).
Clinical research utilizing tumor mutation burd...
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer