Mednet Logo

Do you find data from phase 2 DESTINY-LUNG01 study sufficient to change practice in HER2 mutant NSCLC or is a phase 3 study still needed?

How does trastuzumab deruxtecan compare to other HER2 targeted strategies?
Community PollStarted

Are there specific patient cohorts you would not consider this approach for?

22 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

3 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Lung Cancer Research Foundation (LCRF)
Answered on

I think that phase 3 data are needed but not in the second-line setting. I think a phase 3 trial in the first-line setting of T-Dxd versus chemo +/- IO is the way to go.

Based on DESTINY-Lung01, trastuzumab deruxtecan is more effective than other HER2 targeted strategies overall.

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · UCI Health
Answered on

The phase 2 data appears sufficient to change practice for second line therapy. Just a reminder, in the phase 2 DESTINY-Lung01 study, patients who had progressed following one or more systemic therapies were enrolled. The confirmed ORR by ICR of 54.9% is far better than what docetaxel +/- ramuciruma...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · University of Nebraska Medical Center
Answered on

I think that the results of the DESTINY-Lung 01 study are enough to change practice in HER-2 mutant non-small cell lung cancer, at least in the second line setting. In the first-line setting however, I would prefer to see randomized control trial comparing trastuzumab deruxtecan to chemoimmunotherap...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer