New: NCI-funded clinical trial search
Mednet Logo

Do you forgo adjuvant radiotherapy for men with pT3 prostate cancer who have significant urinary incontinence?

Would you favor only offering salvage therapy if the PSA rises?
5 Answers
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Answered on

I agree that early salvage may be reasonably effective and thus one might carefully observe patients who are not ideal candidates for adjuvant RT. Both the RADICALS study and the RAVES study will examine this issue (timing of post-op RT further). Here's a recent summary of the RAVES trial:

However, a recent article, by Kowalczk, Gu, Nguyen, et al in Urol Oncol 32:303, 2014 suggests that delays of adjuvant RT beyond 5 months are associated with worse prostat...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center
Answered on

This is a pretty common problem that we, as radiation oncologists, face on a regular basis, and the approach needs to be individualized. It is not unusual for a patient to require 3-6 months, or more, to recover continence after radical prostatectomy. I find that I rarely start adjuvant RT before 3 months, in order to allow for recovery of continence. I have waited as long as 12 months, but beyond that point in time, spontaneous recovery of continence is rare, and you'll need to decide whether t...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · University of Chicago
Answered on

On the matter of continence recovery, there is a Belgian paper that studied a subset of 100 men enrolled on the Bolla postop EORTC study (Van Cangh et al). Continence recovery within 3-4 mo after surgery was not a prerequisite to be enrolled. Using a validated measure of continence (pad weight), men given adjuvant RT did not demonstrate inferior continence recovery compared to men observed through 2 years of follow-up. So, poor recovery of continence should not necessarily be the sole factor dri...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Varian Medical Systems/Allegheny health network
Answered on

The true benefit of adjuvant RT for T3 disease is questioned because all the published trial compared adjuvant vs. no adjuvant rather than adjuvant vs. early salvage. This is part of an ongoing study. So if a patient has significant urinary problems, we would rather closely observe with serial PSA and treat with salvage if he develops biochemical recurrence. This way, we can avoid treating a significant number of these patients and avoid adding any additional morbidity.

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · UCLA | VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System
Answered on

Seems like everyone here is on mark. I agree with Howard to be cautious about gambling, especially with GS 8-10. It may also be useful to consider incontinence recovery rates after RP: 65% at 6 months, and 80% by 12 months.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25682782

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer