New: NCI-funded clinical trial search
Mednet Logo

Do you prefer using unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin in stable patients presenting with NSTE ACS awaiting primary PCI (assuming normal renal function)?

Community PollStarted

Do you prefer using unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin in stable patients presenting with NSTE ACS awaiting primary PCI (assuming normal renal function)?

66 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

2 Answers
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Hospital Medicine · Yale School of Medicine/Yale New Haven Hospital
Answered on

I advocate for the use of LMWH. I see a surprising number of patients on unfractionated heparin with PTTs indicating either homeopathic (<35s) or supratherapeutic (>120s) levels of anticoagulation. The 2025 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes summarizes clinical trial and meta-analysis data, which show no significant difference in death, MI, or major bleeding between UFH and LMWH in NSTE-ACS patients undergoing PCI.

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Cardiology · Chesapeake Regional Healthcare
Answered on · Updated on

Unfractionated heparin, with its much shorter T 1/2, is preferred to enoxaparin (T 1/2 12 odd hours), even in the era of transradial procedures (as opposed to transfemoral cases with higher bleed risk).

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer