Do you prefer using unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin in stable patients presenting with NSTE ACS awaiting primary PCI (assuming normal renal function)?
Do you prefer using unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin in stable patients presenting with NSTE ACS awaiting primary PCI (assuming normal renal function)?
Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.
I advocate for the use of LMWH. I see a surprising number of patients on unfractionated heparin with PTTs indicating either homeopathic (<35s) or supratherapeutic (>120s) levels of anticoagulation. The 2025 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes summarizes clinical trial and meta-analysis data, which show no significant difference in death, MI, or major bleeding between UFH and LMWH in NSTE-ACS patients undergoing PCI.
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer
Unfractionated heparin, with its much shorter T 1/2, is preferred to enoxaparin (T 1/2 12 odd hours), even in the era of transradial procedures (as opposed to transfemoral cases with higher bleed risk).
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer