Mednet Logo
CommunityMedical Oncology

Do you recommend prostate RT for patients with metastatic (M1) disease?

A recent NCBD analysis (Rusthoven et al., PMID 27325855) suggests that the addition of prostate RT significantly improves survival compared to ADT alone in men with M1 disease (propensity score-matched 5-year OS 49% vs 33%, P<0.001). The benefit was limited to men who received ≥65 Gy. Are these data sufficient to consider prostate RT for M1 patients, or is local therapy only indicated to palliate symptomatic disease until the STAMPEDE M1 cohort, as well as other randomized trials, establish a benefit in this setting? If you offer prostate RT to M1 patients, what dose and fractionation do you use?
8 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Answered on

My short answer to this provocative question is “no, I don’t offer men with M1 disease local radiation unless there’s a palliative need.” Treating the primary in the asymptomatic M1 scenario, whether with RT or with surgery, is a major commitment of time, resources, and risk to the patient. The leve...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · University of Colorado School of Medicine
Answered on

I’m excited and honored to see a discussion of this manuscript making it all the way to theMednet!

As Dr. @Dr. First Last points out, although the NCDB is an outstanding prospectively-maintained resource, it cannot replace prospective clinical trial data. This is not to say that the trends and outco...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Brigham and Women's Hospital
Answered on

The JCO paper is interesting but hypothesis generating and so we need to await the results of STAMPEDE before offering RT to men with M1 PC off study with the exception of cases where it is being offered for local control to reduce the risk of obstructive sx's later in a patient with large volume lo...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Stephen B. Strum, MD PC
Answered on

I am a clinician focused on prostate cancer since 1983 -- the so-called "dark ages". I may be the oldest HemOnc MD that continues in practice after all these years. Been there and done that for many aspects of this disease. What is missing in the discussion is a much more intense focus on the stagin...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · UC San Diego
Answered on

The original question referenced STAMPEDE. The results have now been published and showed an OS benefit in a subgroup analysis for patients with "low" metastatic burden (the full trial showed a FFS benefit, but not OS). I offer prostate RT to patients with oligometastatic disease, with this analysis...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Rush Medical College of Rush University
Answered on

I have heard some arguments for definitive local treatment (prostatectomy or RT) for patients with oligomets, but I do not agree with this approach since there is no high-quality evidence to justify this approach. I only irradiate bulky primary prostate tumor with obstruction (failure in ADT) or for...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Owensboro Health Mitchell Memorial Cancer Center
Answered on

An intriguing consensus paper recently published showing a majority recommending primary site therapy for synchronous oligometastatic prostate cancer (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28655541). Based on the above comments and this paper, I am currently leaning towards recommending radiation to t...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Prostate Cancer Rsrch and Education Fndtn
Answered on

If the Radiation establishment believes in the Abscopal Effect, then now is the time to conduct studies of Radiation as an ablative procedure to be joined with immune therapy to increase the effectiveness of the Abscopal effect. M1 is a good indication and will save money and human suffering for the...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer