Do you think about CDK4/6 inhibitor selection differently in a patient with de novo rather than recurrent metastatic disease?
Subgroup analyses in MONALEESA-2 suggest more benefit in de novo treatment naive patients, which is in contrast to MONARCH-3 data presented at ESMO 2022 where hazard ratio was similar in these patient groups.
Community PollStarted
Do you think about CDK4/6 inhibitor selection differently in a patient with de novo rather than recurrent metastatic disease?
58 physicians have voted
Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.
2 Answers
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · UCLA
Answered on
Not really. Would recommend endocrine therapy with CDK 4/6i for both patients with de novo metastatic disease and those with disease recurrence. The type of endocrine therapy might vary though - would consider Fulvestrant as endocrine therapy partner for a patient who has disease recurrence on adjuv...
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · University Of Texas Southwestern Medical Center At Dallas
Answered on
No. The selection of first line CDK4/6 inhibitors is dependent on different things including overall survival data, patient characteristics, and other factors elaborated in the answer to the next question. Exploratory subgroup analysis of MONALEESA-2 showed OS benefit in various subgroups consistent...
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer