Mednet Logo

Do you use traditional bony landmarks or contoured nodal volumes when designing breast and supraclavicular treatment fields?

For example, would you consider treating part of the humeral head if required to adequately cover the axillary nodal volume CTV/PTV?
3 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Answered on

The classic field borders and blocks that I was trained with in the 2-dimensional era, result in almost the same field as those achieved by laboriously contouring the nodal volumes and expanding them. That is a testimony to our predecessors’ knowledge of anatomy, clinical examination of patients wit...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Varian Medical Systems/Allegheny health network
Answered on

Do use bony landmarks like the lower end of the clavicle head to set isocenter for three field.

But don’t use bony mark and use nodal contouring to decide the field border and if needed to adequately cover at risk level one node, then part of the humerus head may be in volume.

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Coastal Radiation Oncology
Answered on

This thread brings up the question that we have faced over the decades: just because we can do something in a more complicated way doesn’t mean we should. I remember debating the pros and cons of divergent cerrobend blocks! In this instance, we know the anatomy and the target. Why do we still treat ...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer