Mednet Logo
CommunityNeurology

Do you view the difference between oral and sublingual cyclobenzaprine as clinically significant? 

Will you try the sublingual formulation in a patient who has failed the oral formulation, or vice versa?
Community PollStarted

How do you approach switching between formulations of cyclobenazaprine?

62 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

3 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Rheumatology · Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Answered on

Yes. Oral cyclobenzaprine—a TCA analogue structurally identical to amitriptyline aside from a single double bond—has been used off-label for fibromyalgia for many years. Despite long-standing anecdotal benefit, a prospective placebo-controlled RCT showed only transient improvement at 4 weeks, with n...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Rheumatology · The University of Michigan
Answered on

Cyclobenzaprine has a 30–40 year track record in the treatment of fibromyalgia. For many patients, the primary limitation is not efficacy but tolerability.

There are no head-to-head trials comparing oral and sublingual cyclobenzaprine. The clinically meaningful difference between the two formulation...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Rheumatology · Tufts University School of Medicine
Answered on

The potential advantage of sublingual vs oral cyclobenzaprine is likely related to less adverse side effects, especially early morning sedation. Therefore, I would consider trying the sublingual form in FM patients who failed the oral form, especially because of adverse side effects. I likely would ...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer