Mednet Logo
CommunityNeurology

For which stroke patients, if any, do you recommend implantable loop recorder for long-term cardiac monitoring and why?

It seems clear that longer monitoring yields more AF detected. What is less clear to me is whether all ILR-detected AF is relevant and merits anticoagulation. The recent LOOP study is the first study to my knowledge with stroke reduction as a primary endpoint and showed no benefit despite high rates of detected AF and anticoagulant use.
Community PollStarted

Do you recommend prolonged cardiac monitoring for all patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source?

171 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

4 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Neurology · Yale University
Answered on

Fantastic and pertinent question! I won't pretend that I have an answer, but do have a few thoughts that may help frame further discussion:

  1. We derive our evidence for the efficacy of anticoagulation in stroke prevention from older trials designed to answer that specific question (SPAF, etc.).
  2. In the...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Neurology · Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Answered on

The term embolic stroke of unknown source, or ESUS, implies an embolic type of stroke, i.e., sudden onset, cortical subcortical distribution, not lacunar, and with no demonstrated atherosclerosis either in the carotids or intracranially. Since we suspect a source of embolism, further evaluation with...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Cardiology · Endeavor Health
Answered on

The question was framed as ESUS; i.e., embolic stroke. Typically, neurologists adjudicate whether a stroke is "embolic" or not but my experience is that younger neurologists rarely use the term "lacunar". Thus, if the stroke is clearly NOT due to atherosclerosis of the major intracranial vessels, th...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Neurology · University of Virginia, School of Medicine
Answered on

I usually consider ILR in patients stratified to high risk for PAF with suspected embolic stroke with so far negative workup for embolic causes including atherosclerotic disease (e.g., SYNC, aortic arch evaluation, athero embolism from mild to moderate intracranial stenosis), structural and culprit ...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer