Has the MAJESTY trial changed your approach to the rituximab versus obinutuzumab choice in a patient with newly diagnosed primary membranous nephropathy and nephrotic syndrome?
Fervenza et al., PMID 42246654
Community PollStarted
Has the MAJESTY trial changed your approach to the rituximab versus obinutuzumab choice in a patient with newly diagnosed primary membranous nephropathy and nephrotic syndrome?
70 physicians have voted
Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.
2 Answers
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Nephrology · Johns Hopkins University
Answered on
The Bottom Line: Recent landmark trials—MENTOR and MAJESTY—confirm that anti-CD20 therapies are superior to calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) for the treatment of MN.
Key Trial Data
MENTOR: Demonstrated that RTX was noninferior to cyclosporine at 12 months, and decisively superior by 24 months (60% vs. 20...
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Nephrology · Loyola University Health System
Answered on
I do not think it changes my approach, other than to provide more evidence that anti-CD20 antibodies are more effective than CNIs. There is still no head-to-head comparison of rituximab vs. obinutuzumab. However, the information that is available suggests that obi is more effective than ritux. My li...
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer