Mednet Logo
CommunityMedical Oncology

How are you approaching patients with early-stage NSCLC who progress on neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy and are no longer surgical candidates?

4 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · University of Pennsylvania Health System
Answered on

This is a good question, and we are seeing it too often these days. This question cites progression as the reason for not proceeding to surgery after neoadjuvant chemo-IO. We are also seeing patient refusal and ineligibility (i.e. N3 disease that didn't respond) as reasons. I think it's very importa...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Georgetown University Hospital
Answered on

When surgery is not an issue due to progression on neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy, then definitive chemoradiation would be my preference as it could offer the prospect of long-term survival and response. In this case, the neoadjuvant treatment serves as induction therapy. It is not optimal, though,...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Tennessee Oncology
Answered on

It depends a bit on why they are no longer a surgical candidate (locoregional progression making unresectable vs worsening of medical comorbidities/PS vs distant progression of disease) but assuming we are talking about the former, I would proceed with concurrent chemoradiation followed by consolida...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · West Virginia University
Answered on

One of the biggest issues we see is a lack of appreciation for what defines progression. To address this reality, either thoracic surgery or radiation oncology sees the patient periodically during the course of induction systemic therapy and with this re-assessment in place, there is a lower likelih...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer