Mednet Logo

How do you decide between checkpoint monotherapy versus chemo-immunotherapy approach for patients with PD-L1 High (>50%) NSCLC?

IMPower110 data add further support to use of checkpoint monotherapy; however guidelines continue to support either I/O monotherapy vs chemo-immunotherapy. What clinical factors would impact your treatment approach?
Community PollStarted

Which clinical factors impact your use of immunotherapy alone vs chemo-immunotherapy for PD-L1 >50% NSCLC?

149 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

7 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center
Answered on

At this point, there are no prospective trials comparing checkpoint monotherapy and chemo-immunotherapy for patients with PD-L1 high NSCLC. The ongoing prospective INSIGNA trial will answer this question. If one does a cross trial comparison of pembrolizumab for patients with PD-L1 of >50% and chemo...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · University of Maryland
Answered on

We do not have head-to-head comparison, but looking at the data overall, many of us favor single agent immunotherapy for stage IV NSCLC patients with PD-L1>=50% and without any sensitizing driver mutation. Various trials utilizing single agent IO (KN-024, IMpower-110, EMPower Lung) have demonstrated...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
Answered on

Purely, a clinical decision at this point. I have equipoise comparing Pembrolizumab alone to Pembro combinations in this population. I introduce combination chemotherapy and pembrolizumab in more symptomatic patients with greater metastatic burden, who are fit enough to receive the combination. In t...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Albert Einstein College of Medicine at Montefiore Medical Center
Answered on

While now with new approvals based on CM227 and 9LA, we have a widening array of choices. For most patients with advanced NSCLC, the key choices are between single agent immunotherapy versus chemo/immunotherapy - the main research question addressed by the INSIGNA study amongst patients with PD-L1 p...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Yale School of Medicine
Answered on

For patients who have a good performance status, I always discuss clinical trials for first-line therapy. INSIGNA EA5163/S1709 is a great option that will help to answer the key clinical question of whether use of chemotherapy can be spared or delayed for PDL1 positive for these patients. In additio...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Kettering Cancer Center
Answered on · Updated on

In light of recent data showing IO-resistance in patients with mutations/comutations in STK11, KEAP1, TP53, and KRAS, I now favor IO-chemotherapy combinations for PDL-1 =>50% NSCLC patients with those molecular aberrations, if those mutations are not present, I use IO alone.

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Tennessee Oncology/Sarah Cannon Research Institute
Answered on

I more often use chemo/IO here, because of the safety of the broader approach. I reserve monotherapy for those with a good PS and minimal symptoms. That is a minority of patients seen in the first-line.

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer