Mednet Logo

How does data from the HIMALAYA trial impact your first line treatment selection for advanced HCC?

Community PollStarted

How has HIMALAYA impacted your 1st line treatment selection in advanced HCC?

148 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

8 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Mayo Clinic, Rochester
Answered on

The results from the HIMALAYA trial with the combination tremelimumab (CTLA-4 inhibitor) and durvalumab (PD-L1 inhibitor) reported an OS of 16.4 months compared to 13.8 months for sorafenib which was statistically significant (HR 0.78, p-value of 0.0035). With the limited data presented at ASCO GI 2...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Answered on

HIMALAYA was a multicenter, open-label, phase 3 study comparing sorafenib to durvalumab to tremelimumab plus durvalumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who were treatment naïve. The primary objective was overall survival for tremelimumab plus durvalumab (i.e. STRIDE regimen) versu...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center at Baylor University Medical Center
Answered on

Great to have as an option, especially with patients with GI bleeding not correctable with banding (e.g: GAVE).

I will still prefer atezolizumab bevazicumab when it's appropriate. IMbrave150 included ~20% with high risk disease (massive HCC or PVVT4) while HIMALAYA excluded patients with PVV4 from e...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey
Answered on

These results should not change anything. Results with Atezo-Bev were superior (including high risk patients excluded in HIMALAYA) and the combination with anti-CTLA4 has more significant toxicity than anti-PD1 and Bevacizumab.

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Answered on

The HIMALAYA study presents a novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of HCC. It presents two treatment advances. 1) The first dual checkpoint inhibitor therapy with improved overall survival as first line therapy for HCC, with 2) only one dose of tremelimumab to be given in a patient's improve...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Answered on

It is great to have several options in first line treatment of advanced HCC. Purely immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy will certainly have an important role in first line management of advanced HCC, especially for patients where there would be increased risk of variceal bleeding or contraindi...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Lurie Comp Cancer Center of Northwestern Univ
Answered on

For patients where varices are controlled from risk of bleeding per EGD assessment, I routinely continue to use atezolizumab/bevacizumab as a preferred regimen which is consistent with NCCN guidelines. For patients who cannot receive bevacizumab, there are multiple choices including sorafenib, lenva...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · NYU Grossman School of Medicine
Answered on

Updated answer - April 29, 2024

Selecting the first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) involves considering various factors including the extent of the disease, liver function, patient's overall health/medical comorbidities, and tumor characteristics. I always first consider e...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer