New: NCI-funded clinical trial search
Mednet Logo

How should masticator space involvement be defined: anatomically or by AJCC's vague definition with regards to Nasopharynx Cancer?

This has a big impact on treatment volume delineation if one schema classifies a lesion as T2 and the other leads to classifcation as a T4. In the T4 scenario, one might contour/include the entirety of the sphenoid sinus, clivus, and cavernous sinus. This would be left out/scaled down if the T2 classifciation is used.
Community PollStarted

How should masticator space involvement be defined in nasopharynx cancer?

17 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

1 Answer
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · The START Center for Cancer Care
Answered on · Updated on

That's a great question. I found the following article (linked below), which showed that the anatomic definition of masticator space independently predicts for increased locoregional recurrence and overall survival, and that since the mandibular nerve passes into the anatomic masticator space, that one should cover radiation fields that you would for T4, as the mandibular nerve can be a pathway for retrograde transit of cancer cells from the masticator space to the base of skull via the foramen ovale. From there, it could spread to the gasserian ganglion and to the cavernous sinus. I don't know what others do, but in this type of cancer, it probably is a good idea to get aggressive and not miss.

Tang et al., PMID 20697119

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer