Mednet Logo

How would you manage a patient diagnosed with squamous carcinoma involving the entire length of the vagina and extends into the vulva (introitus), who has severe vaginal stenosis?

She required an episiotomy intraoperatively just to perform an EUA/biopsy. She may not tolerate vaginal cylinder insertion and even if she can, I am uncertain if VBT would adequately cover her disease.
5 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Harold C Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center/UT Southwestern
Answered on

If this is a vaginal lesion involving the vulva, it should be classified as vulva cancer and treated like so.

Typically with ext beam boost to 66 to 70 Gy.

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Varian Medical Systems/Allegheny health network
Answered on

If brachy (including interstitial) is not an option, sometimes we have used straight tandem with a diameter less than a cm instead of cylinder to do brachy with stenosis.

If that is also not an option then would do an IMRT boost to a total dose in the 70s based on OAR dose.

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Answered on

Based on the response to EBRT, there may be a role for interstitial brachytherapy. It may be easier to place a cylinder under anesthesia plus a few perineal needles.

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Willis-Knighton Medical Center
Answered on

I would treat this extensive vulvar cancer with full dose IMRT and low dose cisplatin. Would utilize brachytherapy with a tandem and small sleeves as for a cervix patient with a narrow canal if possible. Interstitial is an option but really dependent on the extent of disease by MRI. I would favor le...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · The Christ Hospital Network
Answered on

Thanks for everyone's input. Her case is complicated by the fact that she has refused chemotherapy and declined consideration of interstitial therapy. Lastly, she is very thin with a prior history of hysterectomy (benign reasons). As a result, small bowel is essentially throughout the low pelvis and...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer