In treatment naive CLL without del(17p)/TP53, will the recent interim analysis of fixed duration acalabrutinib plus venetoclax +/- obinutuzumab vs chemoimmunotherapy in the AMPLIFY trial change your practice?
Community PollStarted
Do you recommend fixed duration acalabrutinib plus venetoclax +/- obinutuzumab for treatment naive CLL without del(17p)/TP53 based on AMPLIFY trial?
89 physicians have voted
Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.
2 Answers
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Hematology · Mayo Clinic
Answered on · Updated on
The interim analysis of the AMPLIFY trial, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, presents strong evidence that could influence clinical practice for treatment-naïve chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients without del(17p) or TP53 mutations. The AMPLIFY trial is the first phase 3 stud...
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Ohio State University
Answered on
Yes, these data have already changed my practice. For many patients, an all-oral fixed-duration doublet is preferable to venetoclax/obinutuzumab. From the AMPLIFY trial, I am comfortable giving acalabrutinib/venetoclax to patients with IGHV-mutated CLL. For those with unmutated IGHV who desire fixed...
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer