Mednet Logo

Is a daily prophylactic dose of aspirin appropriate for patients with coronary artery calcification by Chest CT or an elevated calcium score?

If so, is there a quantitative calcium score or a reported severity of CT coronary artery calcification that would lead you to start daily aspirin?
Community PollStarted

What would be your threshold based on CT images to start a daily low-dose prophylactic aspirin in low-moderate risk patients with coronary artery calcification by chest CT or an elevated calcium score?

248 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

8 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Cardiology · Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine
Answered on

There are no good studies directly answering this question. However, most studies that have looked at statin use in patients with elevated coronary calcium scores have found that many of those patients are also on aspirin 81 mg daily. My own practice is that I would certainly use a statin in patient...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Cardiology · Harvard Medical School
Answered on

Agree. Certainly, statins have the strongest evidence in patients with elevated coronary calcium and evidence of CAD. It is a more nuanced decision regarding low dose as the benefit is less than a statin and needs to counterbalance the risk of bleeding. Certainly, in younger patients with very eleva...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Cardiology · Upstate Cardiology
Answered on
  1. Any amount of CAC is suggestive of CAD.
  2. If you send a patient with chest pains to cardiac cath: he/she has 30-50% plaques and you assume that the chest pains are non-cardiac; you are still going to treat that patient with ASA+ statin+ BP Rx etc.
  3. So I see no difference between #1 and #2. Therefore p...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Cardiology · UMass
Answered on

I agree.

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Cardiology · Mount Alverno Center
Answered on

I would look at known contributors to calcification i.e. Lp(a). If elevated, although generally, the guidelines suggest no treatment, there are studies now finding a reduction in MACE events with PCSK-9 inhibitors. More long-term studies are needed to see the effect on calcium mass in both the coron...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Cardiology · Texas Heart Vascular
Answered on

I do not use the calcium score alone. I try to examine all of the risk factors and come up with overall assessment of risk. There are multiple cardiovascular risk calculators out there. So someone with a greater than 10% risk of cardiac event in the next 10 years, probably I would start the baby asp...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Cardiology · Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
Answered on

No. ASA is not indicated in this case

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Cardiology · Cardiology Clinic Of San Antonio Medical Center
Answered on

When using calcium score, I think it is important to consider the age of the patient. There’s a big difference between a 45-year-old with a coronary calcium score of 100 and a 75-year-old. A 45-year-old has much higher, long-term, cardiac risk and a lower risk of bleeding. Therefore, it is important...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer