Is there any role for re-biopsy and NGS for patients with NSCLC and KRAS G12C at time of progression after first line therapy before starting sotorasib, or after progression on sotorasib?
When (if at all) do you repeat NGS testing later for a patient with known KRAS G12C mutation on initial diagnostic pathology?
Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.
This is a great question and one that will come up more frequently. There clearly is a role for biopsy at the time of progression on targeted therapies in other driver alterations in NSCLC, and in limited data; to date, we know that occasionally there are resistance mechanisms to KRAS inhibitors that may be targetable (including BRAF, ALK, RET, MET as well as non-targetable acquired KRAS mutations: Awad et al., PMID 34161704). So in terms of the second question, I certainly would advocate for rebiopsy/liquid biopsy if feasible.
For the first question, for me, it would depend primarily on the timing/duration of first line therapy. I am thinking of those patients who have had durable responses to first line treatment, or stop treatment due to...
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer