New: NCI-funded clinical trial search
Mednet Logo

Is there any role for SRS+WBRT for patients with a limited number of small brain metastases?

In keeping with prior randomized trials, Alliance N0574 demonstrated that SRS+WBRT provides superior intracranial disease control but worsens QOL and neurocognitive abilities, without improving survival, compared to SRS alone for patients with good performance status and 1-3 brain metastases, none larger than 3 cm in max diameter. Should SRS+WBRT still be considered for patients with high DS-GPA, as suggested by a post-hoc analysis of JROSG 99-1, or in patients who may not adhere to the close surveillance regimen used in Alliance N0574?
1 Answer
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Answered on

The recent publication from Dr Brown confirmed the finding from prior studies, that omitting upfront whole brain RT doesn't compromise OS in patients with limited brain metastases. More importantly, this second study had neurocognition as the primary end point, and confirmed better neurocognition preservation when upfront WBRT was omitted. In this study, despite much higher intracranial failure rate in SRS alone group, the neurocognition in the long term survivors still better in SRS alone group. This would argue, in the modern era, intracranial tumor progression can be managed. Tumor progression is not the primary cause for neurocogntion decline. With all the existing data, it is most appropriate to routinely recommended SRS alone for such...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer