The New England journal of medicine 2024 Apr 11
Alectinib in Resected -Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
Abstract
Background
Platinum-based chemotherapy is the recommended adjuvant treatment for patients with resectable, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data on the efficacy and safety of adjuvant alectinib as compared with chemotherapy in patients with resected ALK-positive NSCLC are lacking.
Methods
We conducted a global, phase 3, open-label, randomized trial in which patients with completely resected, ALK-positive NSCLC of stage IB (tumors ≥4 cm), II, or IIIA (as classified according to the seventh edition of the Cancer Staging Manual of the American Joint Committee on Cancer and Union for International Cancer Control) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive oral alectinib (600 mg twice daily) for 24 months or intravenous platinum-based chemotherapy in four 21-day cycles. The primary end point was disease-free survival, tested hierarchically among patients with stage II or IIIA disease and then in the intention-to-treat population. Other end points included central nervous system (CNS) disease-free survival, overall survival, and safety.
Results
In total, 257 patients were randomly assigned to receive alectinib (130 patients) or chemotherapy (127 patients). The percentage of patients alive and disease-free at 2 years was 93.8% in the alectinib group and 63.0% in the chemotherapy group among patients with stage II or IIIA disease (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13 to 0.45; P<0.001) and 93.6% and 63.7%, respectively, in the intention-to-treat population (hazard ratio, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.43; P<0.001). Alectinib was associated with a clinically meaningful benefit with respect to CNS disease-free survival as compared with chemotherapy (hazard ratio for CNS disease recurrence or death, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.58). Data for overall survival were immature. No unexpected safety findings were observed.
Conclusions
Among patients with resected ALK-positive NSCLC of stage IB, II, or IIIA, adjuvant alectinib significantly improved disease-free survival as compared with platinum-based chemotherapy. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; ALINA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03456076.).
Related Questions
What are your top takeaways in Thoracic Cancers from ASCO 2026?
ASCO 2026 included a wealth of important trials for lung cancer. I will focus on moving the needle for targeted therapy with my top 3 below: LIBRETTO-432 showed a highly significant improvement in DFS with selpercatinib following resection for stage II-IIIA RET fusion-positive NSCLC. The results led...
How do the results of LIBRETTO-432 shape the potential role of adjuvant selpercatinib in patients with early-stage RET fusion-positive NSCLC?
The results of LIBRETTO-432 provide strong evidence to consider selpercatinib for patients with stage II-IIIA RET fusion-positive NSCLC, with a highly significant HR of 0.172 (0.058-0.59) for this cohort. When thinking about stage IB (tumors 3- 4 cm, T2b), most of these patients were not included in...
How would you treat a patient with newly diagnosed ALK+ Stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)?
Stage IIIB encompasses T3-4N2 and T1-2N3, so I will assume that we are not going to consider a neo-adjuvant approach. Standard treatment for stage IIIB ALK+ NSCLC would be definitive concurrent chemo/RT given with curative intent. Reasonable chemo regimens would be weekly carboplatin plus paclitaxel...
How do you decide between neoadjuvant or perioperative chemoimmunotherapy, as per Checkmate 816 or KEYNOTE-671, for early-stage NSCLC?
All of us caring for patients with a lung cancer diagnosis face a very challenging “now what” scenario following publications of many studies demonstrating benefits of a neoadjuvant and/or perioperative approach for the treatment of patients with resectable NSCLC with already 2 FDA approvals of the ...