New: NCI-funded clinical trial search
Mednet Logo

Abstract

Background

Device-detected atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) are atrial arrhythmias detected by implanted cardiac devices. AHREs resemble atrial fibrillation but are rare and brief. Whether the occurrence of AHREs in patients without atrial fibrillation (as documented on a conventional electrocardiogram [ECG]) justifies the initiation of anticoagulants is not known.

Methods

We conducted an event-driven, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized trial involving patients 65 years of age or older who had AHREs lasting for at least 6 minutes and who had at least one additional risk factor for stroke. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive edoxaban or placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or systemic embolism, evaluated in a time-to-event analysis. The safety outcome was a composite of death from any cause or major bleeding.

Results

The analysis population consisted of 2536 patients (1270 in the edoxaban group and 1266 in the placebo group). The mean age was 78 years, 37.4% were women, and the median duration of AHREs was 2.8 hours. The trial was terminated early, at a median follow-up of 21 months, on the basis of safety concerns and the results of an independent, informal assessment of futility for the efficacy of edoxaban; at termination, the planned enrollment had been completed. A primary efficacy outcome event occurred in 83 patients (3.2% per patient-year) in the edoxaban group and in 101 patients (4.0% per patient-year) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60 to 1.08; P = 0.15). The incidence of stroke was approximately 1% per patient-year in both groups. A safety outcome event occurred in 149 patients (5.9% per patient-year) in the edoxaban group and in 114 patients (4.5% per patient-year) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.67; P = 0.03). ECG-diagnosed atrial fibrillation developed in 462 of 2536 patients (18.2% total, 8.7% per patient-year).

Conclusions

Among patients with AHREs detected by implantable devices, anticoagulation with edoxaban did not significantly reduce the incidence of a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or systemic embolism as compared with placebo, but it led to a higher incidence of a composite of death or major bleeding. The incidence of stroke was low in both groups. (Funded by the German Center for Cardiovascular Research and others; NOAH-AFNET 6 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02618577; ISRCTN number, ISRCTN17309850.).

Related Questions

What is the most updated consensus regarding the use of pill in the pocket oral anticoagulation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and populations of patients who are most likely to be considered for enrollment in clinical trials?

2
3 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Cardiology · Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College

I'm not sure that there is a consensus. The best available large trial data would recommend anticoagulation based on a CHADS2Vasc score of 2 or higher, while a score of 0 patients could be off anticoagulation, and if the score is 1, patients would benefit from shared decision-making. For the CHADS2V...

How do you manage asymptomatic non-sustained atrial arrhythmia in patients with single ventricle and Fontan physiology?

1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Cardiology · Baylor College of Medicine/ Texas Children's Hospital

This is an excellent, challenging question and I think experts will disagree and debate the issue depending if they are risk-minimizers or cost-minimizers and if patients are worriers (woulda, coulda, shoulda) or data-driven/evidence-based (need to see large studies with proof before action).I like ...

Do you recommend anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with atrial high rate episodes?

1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Neurology · University of Colorado

In a patient with atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) detected by a device, I would generally only recommend treatment with anticoagulation if the episodes are confirmed as atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter based on an ECG/rhythm strip. Detecting AHREs is important to alert treating clinicians of ...

In light of the NOAH-AFNET6 and ARTESiA trials, how would you approach the decision regarding anticoagulation for patients with incidentally-detected AF <24 hrs on pacemakers/defibrillators?

3
1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Cardiology · Baylor College of Medicine/ Texas Children's Hospital

Finding the right answer for subclinical atrial fibrillation is sometimes hard to tease out the subtleties. The 2023 ACC/AHA/HRS atrial fibrillation guidelines were published in Jan 2024 (Joglar et al., PMID 38033089) and a section (6.4.1) is dedicated to patients with CIED without prior atrial fibr...

Should systemic anticoagulation be considered for patients with a less than 1% atrial fibrillation burden on outpatient monitoring with an elevated CHADSVASc score and acceptable bleeding risk?

1
2 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Cardiology · Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University

This is a recurrent question. My policy is to anticoagulate such patients. The cutoff for anticoagulation is still controversial though. I believe that any episodes lasting longer than 5 min deserve anticoagulation. Not so sure what to do with shorter episodes but my philosophy is that prevention of...