Mednet Logo

Abstract

Background

The prognosis of patients with early relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after the receipt of first-line chemoimmunotherapy is poor.

Methods

In this international, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with large B-cell lymphoma that was refractory to or had relapsed no more than 12 months after first-line chemoimmunotherapy to receive axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel, an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy) or standard care (two or three cycles of investigator-selected, protocol-defined chemoimmunotherapy, followed by high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with a response to the chemoimmunotherapy). The primary end point was event-free survival according to blinded central review. Key secondary end points were response and overall survival. Safety was also assessed.

Results

A total of 180 patients were randomly assigned to receive axi-cel and 179 to receive standard care. The primary end-point analysis of event-free survival showed that axi-cel therapy was superior to standard care. At a median follow-up of 24.9 months, the median event-free survival was 8.3 months in the axi-cel group and 2.0 months in the standard-care group, and the 24-month event-free survival was 41% and 16%, respectively (hazard ratio for event or death, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.51; P<0.001). A response occurred in 83% of the patients in the axi-cel group and in 50% of those in the standard-care group (with a complete response in 65% and 32%, respectively). In an interim analysis, the estimated overall survival at 2 years was 61% in the axi-cel group and 52% in the standard-care group. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 91% of the patients who received axi-cel and in 83% of those who received standard care. Among patients who received axi-cel, grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome occurred in 6% and grade 3 or higher neurologic events in 21%. No deaths related to cytokine release syndrome or neurologic events occurred.

Conclusions

Axi-cel therapy led to significant improvements, as compared with standard care, in event-free survival and response, with the expected level of high-grade toxic effects. (Funded by Kite; ZUMA-7 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03391466.).

Related Questions

How would you consolidate a patient with primary refractory double hit lymphoma with secondary CNS involvement?

2 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Hematology · Keck School of Medicine of USC

Thiotepa-based transplants are particularly rough. We haven't had good outcomes with them in terms of relapse and mortality is much higher than BEAM or Mel autos.Having said that, this patient has chemo-refractory disease. The initial concern with CAR-T in primary CNS or secondary involvement was th...

How should community oncologists practically counsel patients with aggressive lymphomas on the potential treatment course as they move into 2L/3L therapies?

1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Memorial Sloan Kettering

For those who relapse after first line therapy, treatment recommendations are dependent on the timing of relapse. For those who relapse within 12 months of completing first-line therapy and are fit, I would strongly consider referral to a center with CAR T-cell capabilities. As noted before, 5-year ...

How would you manage a transplant-eligible patient with DLBCL who relapsed 6-12 months following a CR1 to R-CHOP and then attained a CR2 to platinum-based salvage chemoimmunotherapy?

3 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · City of Hope

In this case, given that the patient obtained a CR2 to salvage therapy, I would, if they are otherwise eligible, take this patient to transplant given the data presented by Shadman et al., PMID 34570879 which indicates that those with at least a PR from salvage chemotherapy appeared to benefit as mu...

What salvage chemotherapy, if any, would you recommend for a patient with primary refractory DLBCL who progressed after two cycles of R-CHOP?

1
5 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey

Primary progressive DLBCL is certainly clinically challenging. After biopsy confirms the diagnosis, how best to proceed depends on many factors including burden of disease, tempo of disease, and patient characteristics. ZUMA-7 establishes axi-cel as superior to the standard approach of platinum-base...

What radiation dose do you typically use for relapsed DLBCL following 6 cycles of R-CHOP?

2
1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Duke University Medical Center

There are several potential scenarios, all with different answers, so I will illustrate a few.Historically, second-line chemotherapy (e.g., R-ICE) would first be pursued for relapsed DLBCL, and if the disease was still responsive to chemotherapy (CR or PR), then the patient would proceed with high-d...

What is the best approach for patients with DLBCL with early relapse (< 6 months) after initially attaining a CR with 6 cycles RCHOP?

4 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center

Early relapse, regardless of interim imaging, suggests chemorefractory disease. It may be that we selected a more chemo/rituxan resistant clone that comprised a smaller % initially that has now become dominant. Regardless of pathophysiology, I think for today we are stuck with the same paradigm: sal...

How do you incorporate CAR-T cell therapy for DLBCL in transplant-eligible patients?

6 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · The Ohio State University College of Medicine

The role of sequential therapy including CARs vs high dose chemotherapy + ASCT post primary induction failure/relapse in large cell lymphoma is a matter of active research. Given the present FDA indication of CARs is in relapsed/refractory large cell lymphoma after failure of at least 2 lines of pri...