Lancet (London, England) 2019-01-19
Brentuximab vedotin with chemotherapy for CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphoma (ECHELON-2): a global, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial.
Abstract
Background
Based on the encouraging activity and manageable safety profile observed in a phase 1 study, the ECHELON-2 trial was initiated to compare the efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (A+CHP) versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) for the treatment of CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphomas.
Methods
ECHELON-2 is a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, placebo-controlled, active-comparator phase 3 study. Eligible adults from 132 sites in 17 countries with previously untreated CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphomas (targeting 75% with systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either A+CHP or CHOP for six or eight 21-day cycles. Randomisation was stratified by histological subtype according to local pathology assessment and by international prognostic index score. All patients received cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle intravenously and prednisone 100 mg once daily on days 1 to 5 of each cycle orally, followed by either brentuximab vedotin 1·8 mg/kg and a placebo form of vincristine intravenously (A+CHP group) or vincristine 1·4 mg/m2 and a placebo form of brentuximab vedotin intravenously (CHOP group) on day 1 of each cycle. The primary endpoint, progression-free survival according to blinded independent central review, was analysed by intent-to-treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01777152.
Findings
Between Jan 24, 2013, and Nov 7, 2016, 601 patients assessed for eligibility, of whom 452 patients were enrolled and 226 were randomly assigned to both the A+CHP group and the CHOP group. Median progression-free survival was 48·2 months (95% CI 35·2-not evaluable) in the A+CHP group and 20·8 months (12·7-47·6) in the CHOP group (hazard ratio 0·71 [95% CI 0·54-0·93], p=0·0110). Adverse events, including incidence and severity of febrile neutropenia (41 [18%] patients in the A+CHP group and 33 [15%] in the CHOP group) and peripheral neuropathy (117 [52%] in the A+CHP group and 124 [55%] in the CHOP group), were similar between groups. Fatal adverse events occurred in seven (3%) patients in the A+CHP group and nine (4%) in the CHOP group.
Interpretation
Front-line treatment with A+CHP is superior to CHOP for patients with CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphomas as shown by a significant improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival with a manageable safety profile.
Funding
Seattle Genetics Inc, Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmacuetical Company Limited, and National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute Cancer Center.
Related Questions
What is your approach to curative-intent therapy for a young, fit patient with newly-diagnosed monomorphic epitheliotropic intestinal T cell lymphoma (MEITL)?
If >= 10% of the cells express CD30 by IHC, I would treat with BV+CHP x 6 cycles rather than CHOP according to the ECHELON-2 trial (although this trial included only 3 patients with EATL). Historically, the 5-year OS rate with anthracycline-based chemotherapy alone is approximately 10 to 20%, so for...
In light of ALK-directed therapy, what is the role of chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed ALK+ DLBCL?
I haven’t seen any data on ALK inhibitors in DLBCL, I’m assuming partly since it’s a small subset of DLBCL. Presumably, toxicity would be similar to, say, a BTKi + R-CHOP? Maybe would consider off label in the R/R setting, but would not use upfront.Those with ALK+ ALCL typically do well. In that sce...
With new data now available for use of brentuximab in ALK positive, CD30 anaplastic large cell lymphoma, what is your first line regimen?
I would say in the light of ECHLON-II data with a PFS and OS advantage specifically in ALCL and Advanced stage ALK positive disease Brentuximab-CHP would be the most beneficial option and standard of care.