Mednet Logo

Abstract

Background

AKT pathway activation is implicated in endocrine-therapy resistance. Data on the efficacy and safety of the AKT inhibitor capivasertib, as an addition to fulvestrant therapy, in patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer are limited.

Methods

In a phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial, we enrolled eligible pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal women and men with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer who had had a relapse or disease progression during or after treatment with an aromatase inhibitor, with or without previous cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor therapy. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive capivasertib plus fulvestrant or placebo plus fulvestrant. The dual primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival assessed both in the overall population and among patients with AKT pathway-altered (PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN) tumors. Safety was assessed.

Results

Overall, 708 patients underwent randomization; 289 patients (40.8%) had AKT pathway alterations, and 489 (69.1%) had received a CDK4/6 inhibitor previously for advanced breast cancer. In the overall population, the median progression-free survival was 7.2 months in the capivasertib-fulvestrant group, as compared with 3.6 months in the placebo-fulvestrant group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.71; P<0.001). In the AKT pathway-altered population, the median progression-free survival was 7.3 months in the capivasertib-fulvestrant group, as compared with 3.1 months in the placebo-fulvestrant group (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.65; P<0.001). The most frequent adverse events of grade 3 or higher in patients receiving capivasertib-fulvestrant were rash (in 12.1% of patients, vs. in 0.3% of those receiving placebo-fulvestrant) and diarrhea (in 9.3% vs. 0.3%). Adverse events leading to discontinuation were reported in 13.0% of the patients receiving capivasertib and in 2.3% of those receiving placebo.

Conclusions

Capivasertib-fulvestrant therapy resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than treatment with fulvestrant alone among patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer whose disease had progressed during or after previous aromatase inhibitor therapy with or without a CDK4/6 inhibitor. (Funded by AstraZeneca and the National Cancer Institute; CAPItello-291 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04305496.).

Related Questions

For patients with PI3K mutated metastatic breast cancer who progress on a PI3K inhibitor, will you use an alternative PI3K inhibitor subsequently?

1
1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center

Currently, there is no robust clinical evidence supporting the sequential use of different PI3K inhibitors after progression on a prior PI3K inhibitor. The INAVO120 trial (and CAPItello-291 for capivasertib) excluded patients who had prior treatment with any PI3K, AKT, or mTOR inhibitor, or any agen...

Are there scenarios where you would consider use of capivasertib for non-AKT pathway altered patients given the efficacy seen in the overall treatment population of the CAPItello-291 trial?

1
3 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center

While PFS curves are similar in AKT-altered and the overall population, PFS curves are much closer (HR 0.79, 0.61-1.02) in patients with AKT pathway non-altered tumors excluding unknown NGS results (Fig S2), suggesting that the majority of the efficacy is from the AKT-altered population (CAPItello-2...

Would you offer capivasertib+fulvestrant in a patient with metastatic HR+ HER2 negative breast cancer with PTEN mutation who has progressed on fulvestrant plus ribociclib?

2
3 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Avita Health System

Patients who received prior Faslodex were excluded from the CAPItello-291 trial. I guess if you're being a purist you'd have to say no. Just thinking out loud: I don't see updated results, but there was a cohort (cohort B) in the BYLieve trial that was studying letrozole + Alpelisib in patients who ...

How do you define PIK3CA/AKT/PTEN alteration for capivasertib use?

1
2 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Cleveland Clinic

Currently, I am only considering activating mutations in PIK3CA/AKT as well as PTEN alterations for capivasertib use. These are the types of changes that were considered “eligible” in CAPItello-291 for the “pathway altered” analysis. That being said, there was a signal of benefit in the non-pathway ...

What disease characteristics will guide your choice of alpelisib plus fulvestrant (per SOLAR-1) versus capivasertib plus fulvestrant (per CAPItello-291) in PIK3CA mutated advanced ER+/HER2- breast cancer after progression on 1L ET regimen, given both are now approved in this population?

2
3 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center

In the absence of head-to-head comparison, I would use cross-trial comparison to compare the efficacy and safety of alpelisib vs capivasertib. mPFS are similar for both: HR 0.65 (11 vs 5.7 months) for alpelisib (SOLAR-1); and mPFS HR 0.6 (7.2 vs 3.6 months) for capivasertib (CAPItello-291). Therefor...

How do you approach treatment of patients with metastatic HR+ breast cancer with detection of ESR1 mutation after initiation of an AI and CDK4/6 Inhibitor?

1
3 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine

In PADA-1 (SABCS 2021), the development of an ESR1 mutation, regardless of progression on scans, followed by the continuation of palbociclib but changing to fulvestrant, was associated with a PFS of 11.9 m. If one waited until clinical progression, then treated with fulvestrant and palbociclib, the ...

What is the preferred sequence of systemic therapy in a patient with endocrine resistant HR+ metastatic breast cancer?

3 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Baylor College of Medicine/Dan L Duncan Cancer Center

Several factors can affect the next line of therapy in my view like disease free interval (DFI) before the patient developed metastatic disease, duration of response (if any) to prior endocrine with/without CDK4/6i, disease burden, patient's performance status and competing comorbidity. If the patie...

Would you use sequential CDK 4/6 inhibitors in HR-positive metastatic breast CA in successive lines of therapy?

6
5 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · University of Washington Department of Medicine

There is no preclinical or clinical data to support this approach at this time. I would not use sequential therapy in the absence of data. Several studies are ongoing to evaluate whether continued suppression of this pathway in the face of disease progression benefits patients. Until those studies h...