Trials 2022 Sep 05
Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in biologic-naïve patients with active axial psoriatic arthritis: study protocol for STAR, a phase 4, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.
Abstract
Background
Axial involvement constitutes a specific domain of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors have demonstrated improvement in axial PsA (axPsA) symptoms, but have not shown efficacy in treating ankylosing spondylitis (AS), suggesting differences in axPsA processes and treatments. In a post hoc, pooled analysis of patients with investigator- and imaging-confirmed sacroiliitis in two phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled studies (DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2), patients treated with guselkumab, an IL-23p19 inhibitor, had greater axial symptom improvements compared with placebo. Confirmatory imaging at baseline was restricted to the sacroiliac (SI) joints, occurred prior to/at screening, and was locally read.
Methods
The STAR study will prospectively assess efficacy outcomes in PsA patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-confirmed axial inflammation. Eligible, biologic-naïve patients with PsA (N = 405) for ≥ 6 months and active disease (≥ 3 swollen and ≥ 3 tender joints, C-reactive protein [CRP] ≥ 0.3 mg/dL) despite prior non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, apremilast, and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs will be randomized (1:1:1) to guselkumab every 4 weeks (Q4W); guselkumab at week (W) 0, W4, then every 8 weeks (Q8W); or placebo with crossover to guselkumab at W24, W28, then Q8W. Patients will have Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score ≥ 4, spinal pain component score (0-10 visual analog scale) ≥ 4, and screening MRI-confirmed axial involvement (positive spine and/or SI joints according to centrally read Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] score ≥ 3 in ≥ 1 region). The primary endpoint is mean change from baseline in BASDAI at W24; multiplicity controlled secondary endpoints at W24 include AS Disease Activity Score employing CRP (ASDAS), Disease Activity Index for PsA (DAPSA), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Investigator's Global Assessment of skin disease (IGA), and mean changes from baseline in MRI SI joint SPARCC scores. Centrally read MRIs of spine and SI joints (scored using SPARCC) will be obtained at W0, W24, and W52, with readers blinded to treatment group and timepoint. Treatment group comparisons will be performed using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel or chi-square test for binary endpoints and analysis of covariance, mixed model for repeated measures, or constrained longitudinal data analysis for continuous endpoints.
Discussion
This study will evaluate the ability of guselkumab to reduce both axial symptoms and inflammation in patients with active PsA.
Trial registration
This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04929210 , on 18 June 2021.
Protocol version
Version 1.0 dated 14 April 2021.
Related Questions
How do you approach management of patients with psoriatic arthritis who have significant improvement in skin disease, but ongoing inflammatory arthritis despite multiple DMARDs and/or biologics?
Psoriatic arthritis is a heterogeneous disease and often the severity of MSK involvement and psoriasis are not well correlated. This is also true regarding treatment response. The approach to management in these cases depends on several factors:Psoriasis type and severity: If the patient has mild ps...
Would you consider a biologic or JAK inhibitor to manage active PsA in a patient on chronic antibiotic therapy if they had previously failed all conventional DMARDs (including apremilast)?
IL-23i such as guselkumab have not really shown a significantly higher incidence of infections or malignancies, so I would favor these over other biologics. Ustekinumab (IL-12,23i) also showed lower rates of infection compared with other biologics. However, something to consider is whether they have...