The New England journal of medicine 2024 Jun 03
Isatuximab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.
Abstract
Background
Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) is a preferred first-line treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Whether the addition of the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody isatuximab to the VRd regimen would reduce the risk of disease progression or death among patients ineligible to undergo transplantation is unclear.
Methods
In an international, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 3:2 ratio, patients 18 to 80 years of age with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible to undergo transplantation to receive either isatuximab plus VRd or VRd alone. The primary efficacy end point was progression-free survival. Key secondary end points included a complete response or better and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status in patients with a complete response.
Results
A total of 446 patients underwent randomization. At a median follow-up of 59.7 months, the estimated progression-free survival at 60 months was 63.2% in the isatuximab-VRd group, as compared with 45.2% in the VRd group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.60; 98.5% confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.88; P<0.001). The percentage of patients with a complete response or better was significantly higher in the isatuximab-VRd group than in the VRd group (74.7% vs. 64.1%, P = 0.01), as was the percentage of patients with MRD-negative status and a complete response (55.5% vs. 40.9%, P = 0.003). No new safety signals were observed with the isatuximab-VRd regimen. The incidence of serious adverse events during treatment and the incidence of adverse events leading to discontinuation were similar in the two groups.
Conclusions
Isatuximab-VRd was more effective than VRd as initial therapy in patients 18 to 80 years of age with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible to undergo transplantation. (Funded by Sanofi and a Cancer Center Support Grant; IMROZ ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03319667.).
Related Questions
What are your top takeaways in Hematologic Malignancies from ASH 2024?
Abstract 1009 - Multiple important studies were presented at the recently concluded ASH meeting. From the CLL perspective, one of the most impactful studies was the AMPLIFY clinical trial that compared acalabrutinib plus venetoclax with or without obinutuzumab versus chemoimmunotherapy for first-li...
When, if ever, would you select a three-drug regimen instead of four-drug regimen in patients with newly diagnosed Multiple Myeloma?
Thank you for this question. For older, transplant-ineligible patients, there is no data that patients live longer or better (the true goals of treatment) with four drugs instead of three drugs. Yes, the responses are better, and we hope this may translate to longevity over time, but we do not know ...
Are you still recommending autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for all eligible myeloma patients who achieve remission after induction with a quadruplet regimen?
Our institution still recommends upfront autologous transplant for most fit patients. We appreciate the recent results from CEPHEUS and BENEFIT, but if we believe that achieving MRD negativity is important, the addition of autologous transplant improves the rate of MRD negativity, which ultimately s...
What clinical or logistical factors influence your choice of anti-CD38 antibody in first-line treatment of multiple myeloma?
I generally use daratumumab, because subcutaneous is more convenient for patients, and we go to once-a-month dosing much quicker with daratumumab compared to isatuximab. Once isatuximab subcutaneous is available, this advantage of daratumumab may be lost, but given comfort and familiarity with darat...
How does one approach maintenance treatment in transplant ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma?
IMROZ and BENEFIT trials are interesting in that they are billed as for transplant-ineligible patients, yet frail patients were excluded, so I don't think they give us the answer for how to maintain a frail patient. The best answer for a frail patient is, I believe, the MAIA trial, which gives DRD t...
Do you recommend utilizing daratumumab in the maintenance phase after a quadruplet induction for transplant eligible multiple myeloma?
Great question as always - both the Phase 2 GRIFFIN study (Dara-VRd vs VRd using IV Dara and 21-day induction cycles) and the Phase 3 PERSEUS study (Dara-VRd vs VRd using subQ dara and 28-day induction cycles) went on to use dara + lenalidomide for all patients in the post-transplant maintenance set...
Do you continue bortezomib past 8 cycles for transplant ineligible patients with multiple myeloma on VRd who are tolerating therapy well with no neuropathy?
Excellent question without a clear answer. While several RCTs have looked at post-induction maintenance among patients without planned transplantations, the British Myeloma XI trial is the biggest RCT (to my knowledge) to clearly look at lenalidomide vs observation in transplant-ineligible patients....
What is your preferred first line treatment regimen for patients with untreated transplant-ineligible MM?
For transplant-ineligible patients, there are many excellent choices, including RVD lite and Dara Rd. My practice has shifted to Dara Rd for several reasons: The HR for Dara Rd v. Rd which is 0.56 appears to be better than the HR for RVd v. Rd in SWOG 0777, where it was 0.712 (though it should be no...
How do you utilize lenalidomide maintenance in non-transplant eligible myeloma?
Maintenance is a standard of care management for both transplant eligible and transplant ineligible, regardless of type of induction regimen. Studies have shown benefit for both groups. Time to progression (PFS) almost twice as long for both groups with maintenance compared to no maintenance. - For ...