Mednet Logo

Abstract

Background

Survival is poor among patients with triple-class-exposed relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel), a B-cell maturation antigen-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, previously led to deep, durable responses in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.

Methods

In this international, open-label, phase 3 trial involving adults with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who had received two to four regimens previously (including immunomodulatory agents, proteasome inhibitors, and daratumumab) and who had disease refractory to the last regimen, we randomly assigned patients in a 2:1 ratio to receive either ide-cel (dose range, 150×106 to 450×106 CAR-positive T cells) or one of five standard regimens. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Key secondary end points were overall response (partial response or better) and overall survival. Safety was assessed.

Results

A total of 386 patients underwent randomization: 254 to ide-cel and 132 to a standard regimen. A total of 66% of the patients had triple-class-refractory disease, and 95% had daratumumab-refractory disease. At a median follow-up of 18.6 months, the median progression-free survival was 13.3 months in the ide-cel group, as compared with 4.4 months in the standard-regimen group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.65; P<0.001). A response occurred in 71% of the patients in the ide-cel group and in 42% of those in the standard-regimen group (P<0.001); a complete response occurred in 39% and 5%, respectively. Data on overall survival were immature. Adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 93% of the patients in the ide-cel group and in 75% of those in the standard-regimen group. Among the 225 patients who received ide-cel, cytokine release syndrome occurred in 88%, with 5% having an event of grade 3 or higher, and investigator-identified neurotoxic effects occurred in 15%, with 3% having an event of grade 3 or higher.

Conclusions

Ide-cel therapy significantly prolonged progression-free survival and improved response as compared with standard regimens in patients with triple-class-exposed relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who had received two to four regimens previously. The toxicity of ide-cel was consistent with previous reports. (Funded by 2seventy bio and Celgene, a Bristol-Myers Squibb company; KarMMa-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03651128.).

Related Questions

What are your top takeaways in Hematologic Malignancies from ASCO 2026?

1
7 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Hematology · University of Chicago

Phase III SENTRY study of ruxolitinib +/- selinexor in myelofibrosis - The combination arm met the spleen response endpoint, had similar rates of symptom improvement compared to ruxolitinib, and, with short follow-up, there appears to be a signal towards survival benefit. Longer-term follow-up will...

What are your top takeaways in Hematologic Malignancies from ASCO 2024?

5 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Hematology · The Ohio State University - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute

Always an exciting conference for myeloma and this year was no exception.1. IMROZ study: The management of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) has evolved significantly over the past few years. One of the first clinical assessments in planning treatment is determining eligibility for autologous ...

How would you approach BCMA-directed therapy in a patient with myeloma and renal failure on dialysis?

2 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

The short answer: Very carefully. Lots of anecdotes and theoretical fears out there, but very little real data to guide us as of July 2023 as I write this. The largest experience with BCMA CAR-T with CKD is this TCT abstract by Sidana and colleagues that I don't think has been published yet:Sidana e...

Would you implement CAR-T therapy earlier in practice if approved in earlier lines for multiple myeloma based on the KarMMa-3 and CARTITUTUDE-4 studies?

1
3 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

I agree with @Dr. First Last's excellent take on CARTITUDE-4 and KarMMA-3. For patients who have had 2 prior lines of therapy, I am absolutely going to reach for CAR-T (or bispecific antibodies as their earlier-line studies get published) with an emphasis on cilta-cel based on the data at hand.But w...