Ann Surg
Impact of Breast Surgery in Primary Metastasized Breast Cancer: Outcomes of the Prospective Randomized Phase III ABCSG-28 POSYTIVE Trial.
Abstract
Background
Conflicting evidence exists regarding the value of surgical resection of the primary in stage IV breast cancer patients.
Objective
The prospective randomized phase III ABCSG-28 POSYTIVE trial evaluated median survival comparing primary surgery followed by systemic therapy to primary systemic therapy in de novo stage IV breast cancer.
Methods
Between 2011 and 2015, 90 previously untreated stage IV breast cancer patients were randomly assigned to surgical resection of the primary tumor followed by systemic therapy (Arm A) or primary systemic therapy (Arm B) in Austria. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the primary study endpoint.
Results
The trial was stopped early due to poor recruitment. Ninety patients (45 arm A, 45 arm B) were included; median follow-up was 37.5 months. Patients in the surgery arm had more cT3 breast cancer (22.2% vs 6.7%) and more cN2 staging (15.6% vs 4.4%). Both groups were well balanced with respect to the type of first-line systemic treatment. Median survival in arm A was 34.6 months, versus 54.8 months in the nonsurgery arm [hazard ratio (HR) 0.691, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.358-1.333; P = 0.267]; time to distant progression was 13.9 months in the surgery arm and 29.0 months in the nonsurgery arm (HR 0.598, 95% CI 0.343-1.043; P = 0.0668).
Conclusion
The prospective phase III trial ABCSG-28 (POSYTIVE) could not demonstrate an OS benefit for surgical resection of the primary in breast cancer patients presenting with de novo stage IV disease.
Related Questions
Do you offer consolidative radiation for oligometastatic breast cancer?
I'd like to add a few additional considerations to the already excellent responses from our colleagues. Many of the trials cited actually address two related but distinct clinical questions, and the answer for HER2-positive disease specifically may diverge from the population-level results.Trials of...
In which scenarios do you stage breast cancer using CT and nuclear bone scans versus PET-CT?
In a recent study (Dayes et al., PMID 37235845), systemic staging with FDG PET-CT more frequently changed the clinical stage from IIB or III breast cancer to stage IV disease (23% metastases detection rate) than staging with CTs of the chest, abdomen, pelvis, and a bone scan combined (11% metastases...
Would you offer definitive local therapy to a patient with ER/PR+, Her2 neg breast cancer with oligometastatic disease that responded well to CDK 4/6 inhibitor +AI, despite NRG-BR002 results?
The description of "ER/PR positive HER2 negative right breast cancer with a synchronous single site of oligo-metastatic disease in the right 4th rib (near primary tumor but not clearly direct extension) and good response to 6 months of AI+CDK4i" suggests that the primary breast cancer is intact. The...