The New England journal of medicine 2011-12-29
Incorporation of bevacizumab in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer.
Abstract
Background
Vascular endothelial growth factor is a key promoter of angiogenesis and disease progression in epithelial ovarian cancer. Bevacizumab, a humanized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody, has shown single-agent activity in women with recurrent tumors. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the addition of bevacizumab to standard front-line therapy.
Methods
In our double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned eligible patients with newly diagnosed stage III (incompletely resectable) or stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer who had undergone debulking surgery to receive one of three treatments. All three included chemotherapy consisting of intravenous paclitaxel at a dose of 175 mg per square meter of body-surface area, plus carboplatin at an area under the curve of 6, for cycles 1 through 6, plus a study treatment for cycles 2 through 22, each cycle of 3 weeks' duration. The control treatment was chemotherapy with placebo added in cycles 2 through 22; bevacizumab-initiation treatment was chemotherapy with bevacizumab (15 mg per kilogram of body weight) added in cycles 2 through 6 and placebo added in cycles 7 through 22. Bevacizumab-throughout treatment was chemotherapy with bevacizumab added in cycles 2 through 22. The primary end point was progression-free survival.
Results
Overall, 1873 women were enrolled. The median progression-free survival was 10.3 months in the control group, 11.2 in the bevacizumab-initiation group, and 14.1 in the bevacizumab-throughout group. Relative to control treatment, the hazard ratio for progression or death was 0.908 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.795 to 1.040; P=0.16) with bevacizumab initiation and 0.717 (95% CI, 0.625 to 0.824; P<0.001) with bevacizumab throughout. At the time of analysis, 76.3% of patients were alive, with no significant differences in overall survival among the three groups. The rate of hypertension requiring medical therapy was higher in the bevacizumab-initiation group (16.5%) and the bevacizumab-throughout group (22.9%) than in the control group (7.2%). Gastrointestinal-wall disruption requiring medical intervention occurred in 1.2%, 2.8%, and 2.6% of patients in the control group, the bevacizumab-initiation group, and the bevacizumab-throughout group, respectively.
Conclusions
The use of bevacizumab during and up to 10 months after carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy prolongs the median progression-free survival by about 4 months in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and Genentech; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00262847.).
Related Questions
When prescribing bevacizumab for high-risk primary ovarian cancer, do you use 15 mg/m2 q 21 days (per GOG-0218) or 7.5 mg/m2 q 21 days (per ICON7)?
Interesting question. I was told once when bevacizumab was being developed by Genentech that the basic scientists predicted 5 mg/kg would saturate all the VEGF receptors in a typical adult (unconfirmed but told by someone in my remote past...I should confirm with Genentech). How 15 mg/kg was arrived...
For an optimally cytoreduced, stage III ovarian carcinosarcoma, would you offer bevacizumab maintenance after completion of adjuvant carboplatin/taxol?
For an optimally cytoreduced patient with Stage III ovarian carcinosarcoma, I would not add bevacizumab unless the patient was "optimal" at interval surgery and had neoadjuvant and adjuvant use of bevacizumab with chemo and then to be continued in maintenance. The use of bevacizumab with chemo in th...
What pre-treatment findings on CT scan (if any) influence your concern for GI perforation risk with bevacizumab use in ovarian cancer patients?
This is really a two parts question. The first question would be, do you offer bevacizumab to all your ovarian cancer patients and the second question would be what patients would you not recommend bevacizumab because of concern for bowel perforation? Based on findings from GOG218 and ICON7, I only ...
Do you recommend frontline bevacizumab with carbo/taxol in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian and BRCA mutation who will be receiving olaparib maintenance?
As shown in GOG-218, there is no apparent benefit to using concurrent bevacizumab with paclitaxel and carboplatin in the first-line setting, if this drug is not then continued during maintenance therapy. Our approach is to obtain genetic testing in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer as soon as ...
In light of GOG-252, are there any situations where IP chemotherapy would be preferable following debulking of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer?
In GOG-252, the control arm (arm 1) was the dose-dense Japanese GOG (JGOG) regimen, compared to two IP-based arms (arm 2, IP carboplatin, and arm 3, IP cisplatin). As stated in our OGR, interpretation of the negative results of this study is difficult for several reasons. All three arms in GOG-252 r...
How do you manage maintenance therapy in BRCA wild type patients who have undergone primary surgery and achieved an optimal/complete gross resection?
I do not personally utilize maintenance bevacizumab in the upfront setting for wtBRCA patients who had primary optimal resection as I do not think the small PFS benefit demonstrated in GOG 218 and ICON 7 (evaluating use of maintenance bev vs no maintenance) justifies the additional cost and morbidit...
Should women with adequately debulked ovarian cancer receive bevacizumab with chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting?
The answer to this question is definitively NO.Two large, definitive studies (ICON-7 and GOG218 – including over 3400 patient combined) evaluated the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy with concurrent + maintenance bevacizumab. Analysis of mature data from ICON-7 demonstrated a significant overall surv...