European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology 2012-04
Involved anterior margins after breast conserving surgery: is re-excision required?
Abstract
Background
Complete tumour excision in breast conserving surgery (BCS) is critical for successful outcome; involved circumferential resection margins are associated with increased disease recurrence. However, the importance of an involved anterior margin (IAM) is less clear. The purpose of this study was to review an aggressive approach to IAM and hence assess whether anterior margin re-excision (RE) yields clinical benefit.
Methods
A review of prospectively collected clinical and pathology data was performed for all patients who underwent BCS between 2006 and 2010 through a single cancer centre. An involved margin was defined as < 1 mm clearance of invasive or in-situ breast cancer.
Results
1667 patients underwent BCS for invasive and/or in-situ disease, of whom 114 underwent RE. A total of 170 involved margins were identified: most commonly the anterior (52 margins) followed by the posterior (39 margins) and inferior (31 margins) margin. Patients with IAM were more likely to have grade 3 invasive disease (p = 0.0323) but less likely to have residual disease found at re-excision (2/49 vs. 32/101 margins, p = 0.0033); there were no differences when in-situ characteristics were compared.
Conclusions
RE of IAM after BCS rarely yields further disease; multi-disciplinary teams should consider whether further therapy for an IAM is required on a patient by patient basis.
Related Questions
Do you recommend re-excision of a unifocal positive anterior margin at skin after lumpectomy in a patient with otherwise low risk breast cancer features?
There are few data on how margin location affects outcome. A group from Dundee and Perth in Scotland reported that re-excision performed for an anterior margin of less than 1 mm found residual disease in only 4% of patients who had initial excision in the subcutaneous plane, compared to 24% of patie...
When doing a tumor bed boost following whole breast irradiation, what do you typically use for CTV and PTV margin for photon and electron plans?
The optimal boost volume is unknown. Small differences in the size or placement of the boost seem unlikely to impact the risk of recurrence (1,2). Intrafraction motion of the excision cavity is small (3). My own practice is to give a total expansion of 15 mm around the excision cavity to create the ...