Nature medicine 2024 Jun 03
Isatuximab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone and bortezomib in transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma: the randomized phase 3 BENEFIT trial.
Abstract
CD38-targeting immunotherapy is approved in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) that are transplant ineligible (TI) and is considered the best standard of care (SOC). To improve current SOC, we evaluated the added value of weekly bortezomib (V) to isatuximab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IsaRd versus Isa-VRd). This Intergroupe Francophone of Myeloma phase 3 study randomized 270 patients with NDMM that were TI, aged 65-79 years, to IsaRd versus Isa-VRd arms. The primary endpoint was a minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate at 10-5 by next-generation sequencing at 18 months from randomization. Key secondary endpoints included response rates, MRD assessment rates, survival and safety. The 18-month MRD negativity rates at 10-5 were reported in 35 patients (26%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 19-34) in IsaRd versus 71 (53%, 95% CI 44-61) in Isa-VRd (odds ratio for MRD negativity 3.16, 95% CI 1.89-5.28, P < 0.0001). The MRD benefit was consistent across subgroups at 10-5 and 10-6, and was already observed at month 12. The proportion of patients with complete response or better at 18 months was higher with Isa-VRd (58% versus 33%; P < 0.0001), as was the proportion of MRD negativity and complete response or better (37% versus 17%; P = 0.0003). At a median follow-up of 23.5 months, no difference was observed for survival times (immature data). The addition of weekly bortezomib did not significantly affect the relative dose intensity of IsaRd. Isa-VRd significantly increased MRD endpoints, including the 18-month negativity rate at 10-5, the primary endpoint, compared with IsaRd. This study proposes Isa-VRd as a new SOC for patients with NDMM that are TI. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04751877 .
Related Questions
What are your top takeaways in Hematologic Malignancies from ASH 2024?
Abstract 1009 - Multiple important studies were presented at the recently concluded ASH meeting. From the CLL perspective, one of the most impactful studies was the AMPLIFY clinical trial that compared acalabrutinib plus venetoclax with or without obinutuzumab versus chemoimmunotherapy for first-li...
When, if ever, would you select a three-drug regimen instead of four-drug regimen in patients with newly diagnosed Multiple Myeloma?
Thank you for this question. For older, transplant-ineligible patients, there is no data that patients live longer or better (the true goals of treatment) with four drugs instead of three drugs. Yes, the responses are better, and we hope this may translate to longevity over time, but we do not know ...
What clinical or logistical factors influence your choice of anti-CD38 antibody in first-line treatment of multiple myeloma?
I generally use daratumumab, because subcutaneous is more convenient for patients, and we go to once-a-month dosing much quicker with daratumumab compared to isatuximab. Once isatuximab subcutaneous is available, this advantage of daratumumab may be lost, but given comfort and familiarity with darat...
How does one approach maintenance treatment in transplant ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma?
IMROZ and BENEFIT trials are interesting in that they are billed as for transplant-ineligible patients, yet frail patients were excluded, so I don't think they give us the answer for how to maintain a frail patient. The best answer for a frail patient is, I believe, the MAIA trial, which gives DRD t...
What are your top takeaways in Hematologic Malignancies from ASCO 2024?
Always an exciting conference for myeloma and this year was no exception.1. IMROZ study: The management of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) has evolved significantly over the past few years. One of the first clinical assessments in planning treatment is determining eligibility for autologous ...
Based on the DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8 data, how would you incorporate belantamab mafadotin in your practice?
This is definitely top of mind with the publication of the DREAMM, BENEFIT, and IMROZ trials. Given my standard sequencing of myeloma treatments in non t(11;14) patients who are not clinical trial candidates, there is no longer a good time to incorporate a toxic BCMA antibody drug conjugate into the...
Based on the IMROZ and BENEFIT data, would you recommend quadruplet therapy for non transplant eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma?
Excellent question - to add citations for those who missed ASCO 2024 (I did since I was on inpatient!) and would like to jump to the manuscripts: IMROZ: Isa-VRd versus VRd (Facon et al., PMID 38832972) BENEFIT/IFM 2020-05: Isa-VRd versus Isa-Rd (Leleu et al., PMID 38830994) Both trials enrolled pati...
How do you utilize lenalidomide maintenance in non-transplant eligible myeloma?
Maintenance is a standard of care management for both transplant eligible and transplant ineligible, regardless of type of induction regimen. Studies have shown benefit for both groups. Time to progression (PFS) almost twice as long for both groups with maintenance compared to no maintenance. - For ...