The New England journal of medicine 2021 May 15
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion during Cardiac Surgery to Prevent Stroke.
Abstract
Background
Surgical occlusion of the left atrial appendage has been hypothesized to prevent ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, but this has not been proved. The procedure can be performed during cardiac surgery undertaken for other reasons.
Methods
We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial involving participants with atrial fibrillation and a CHA2DS2-VASc score of at least 2 (on a scale from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating greater risk of stroke) who were scheduled to undergo cardiac surgery for another indication. The participants were randomly assigned to undergo or not undergo occlusion of the left atrial appendage during surgery; all the participants were expected to receive usual care, including oral anticoagulation, during follow-up. The primary outcome was the occurrence of ischemic stroke (including transient ischemic attack with positive neuroimaging) or systemic embolism. The participants, research personnel, and primary care physicians (other than the surgeons) were unaware of the trial-group assignments.
Results
The primary analysis population included 2379 participants in the occlusion group and 2391 in the no-occlusion group, with a mean age of 71 years and a mean CHA2DS2-VASc score of 4.2. The participants were followed for a mean of 3.8 years. A total of 92.1% of the participants received the assigned procedure, and at 3 years, 76.8% of the participants continued to receive oral anticoagulation. Stroke or systemic embolism occurred in 114 participants (4.8%) in the occlusion group and in 168 (7.0%) in the no-occlusion group (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.53 to 0.85; P = 0.001). The incidence of perioperative bleeding, heart failure, or death did not differ significantly between the trial groups.
Conclusions
Among participants with atrial fibrillation who had undergone cardiac surgery, most of whom continued to receive ongoing antithrombotic therapy, the risk of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism was lower with concomitant left atrial appendage occlusion performed during the surgery than without it. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; LAAOS III ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01561651.).
Related Questions
Can cardioversion be safely performed for recurrent atrial fibrillation in patients who have undergone left atrial appendage clipping during CABG, if they are not on chronic anticoagulation anymore?
Based upon the LAAOS III trial, we know that patients with left atrial appendage ligation at the time of cardiac surgery have a lower risk of stroke compared to those who did not when anticoagulation is continued in both groups. The data is much less clear for complete cessation of anticoagulation a...
For patients who have previously undergone MAZE ligation presenting with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, how would you counsel them on the risk of stroke long-term when deciding whether or not to start or continue anticoagulation?
The decision to start or continue anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation can be challenging, even after LAA closure. Specifically related to surgical closure of the LAA (excluding percutaneous LAAO, such as Watchman or Amulet), anticoagulation is still recommended indefinitely if suppo...
What factors would guide your decision to safely resume anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation following a recent intracranial hemorrhage?
Whether a patient with atrial fibrillation and an intracerebral hemorrhage should resume anticoagulation depends on whether the bleed was attributed to cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). Most patients with CAA should not be on long-term (lifelong) anticoagulation. If a bleed was attributed to hypert...