Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2009-04-01
Multi-institutional phase I/II trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases.
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of high-dose stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of patients with one to three hepatic metastases.
Patients and methods
Patients with one to three hepatic lesions and maximum individual tumor diameters less than 6 cm were enrolled and treated on a multi-institutional, phase I/II clinical trial in which they received SBRT delivered in three fractions. During phase I, the total dose was safely escalated from 36 Gy to 60 Gy. The phase II dose was 60 Gy. The primary end point was local control. Lesions with at least 6 months of radiographic follow-up were considered assessable for local control. Secondary end points were toxicity and survival.
Results
Forty-seven patients with 63 lesions were treated with SBRT. Among them, 69% had received at least one prior systemic therapy regimen for metastatic disease (range, 0 to 5 regimens), and 45% had extrahepatic disease at study entry. Only one patient experienced grade 3 or higher toxicity (2%). Forty-nine discrete lesions were assessable for local control. Median follow-up for assessable lesions was 16 months (range, 6 to 54 months). The median maximal tumor diameter was 2.7 cm (range, 0.4 to 5.8 cm). Local progression occurred in only three lesions at a median of 7.5 months (range, 7 to 13 months) after SBRT. Actuarial in-field local control rates at one and two years after SBRT were 95% and 92%, respectively. Among lesions with maximal diameter of 3 cm or less, 2-year local control was 100%. Median survival was 20.5 months.
Conclusion
This multi-institutional, phase I/II trial demonstrates that high-dose liver SBRT is safe and effective for the treatment of patients with one to three hepatic metastases.
Related Questions
Would you offer liver SBRT without fiducial placement?
When we first started doing liver SBRT cases in the early Paleolithic 2000s (refs), we never used fiducials and just managed by using the nearest liver surface contour (or diaphragm if using a breath hold technique) and/or any other intrahepatic anatomy that was distinguishable once we added CBCT. I...
What cumulative dose constraints would you use for the normal liver when repeating SBRT for liver metastases with a longer time interval (i.e. 2-3 years)?
I will assess cumulative dose within the normal liver with retreatment but if the interval is 2-3 years, I think there has been enough repair in a non cirrhotic liver that one could consider it nearly de novo treatment. There has been very little literature directly examining the impact of re-irradi...