Lancet Oncol 2021 Apr 13
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX and preoperative chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (UNICANCER-PRODIGE 23): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.
Abstract
Background
Treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer with chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy controls local disease, but distant metastases remain common. We aimed to assess whether administering neoadjuvant chemotherapy before preoperative chemoradiotherapy could reduce the risk of distant recurrences.
Methods
We did a phase 3, open-label, multicentre, randomised trial at 35 hospitals in France. Eligible patients were adults aged 18-75 years and had newly diagnosed, biopsy-proven, rectal adenocarcinoma staged cT3 or cT4 M0, with a WHO performance status of 0-1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group or standard-of-care group, using an independent web-based system by minimisation method stratified by centre, extramural extension of the tumour into perirectal fat according to MRI, tumour location, and stage. Investigators and participants were not masked to treatment allocation. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy group received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 intravenously every 14 days for 6 cycles), chemoradiotherapy (50 Gy during 5 weeks and 800 mg/m2 concurrent oral capecitabine twice daily for 5 days per week), total mesorectal excision, and adjuvant chemotherapy (3 months of modified FOLFOX6 [intravenous oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and leucovorin 400 mg/m2, followed by intravenous 400 mg/m2 fluorouracil bolus and then continuous infusion at a dose of 2400 mg/m2 over 46 h every 14 days for six cycles] or capecitabine [1250 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1-14 every 21 days]). The standard-of-care group received chemoradiotherapy, total mesorectal excision, and adjuvant chemotherapy (for 6 months). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival assessed in the intention-to-treat population at 3 years. Safety analyses were done on treated patients. This trial was registered with EudraCT (2011-004406-25) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01804790) and is now complete.
Findings
Between June 5, 2012, and June 26, 2017, 461 patients were randomly assigned to either the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (n=231) or the standard-of-care group (n=230). At a median follow-up of 46·5 months (IQR 35·4-61·6), 3-year disease-free survival rates were 76% (95% CI 69-81) in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 69% (62-74) in the standard-of-care group (stratified hazard ratio 0·69, 95% CI 0·49-0·97; p=0·034). During neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (38 [17%] of 225 patients) and diarrhoea (25 [11%] of 226). During chemoradiotherapy, the most common grade 3-4 adverse event was lymphopenia (59 [28%] of 212 in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group vs 67 [30%] of 226 patients in the standard-of-care group). During adjuvant chemotherapy, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were lymphopenia (18 [11%] of 161 in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group vs 42 [27%] of 155 in the standard-of-care group), neutropenia (nine [6%] of 161 vs 28 [18%] of 155), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (19 [12%] of 162 vs 32 [21%] of 155). Serious adverse events occurred in 63 (27%) of 231 participants in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 50 (22%) of 230 patients in the standard-of-care group (p=0·167), during the whole treatment period. During adjuvant therapy, serious adverse events occurred in 18 (11%) of 163 participants in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 36 (23%) of 158 patients in the standard-of-care group (p=0·0049). Treatment-related deaths occurred in one (<1%) of 226 patients in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (sudden death) and two (1%) of 227 patients in the standard-of-care group (one sudden death and one myocardial infarction).
Interpretation
Intensification of chemotherapy using FOLFIRINOX before preoperative chemoradiotherapy significantly improved outcomes compared with preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with cT3 or cT4 M0 rectal cancer. The significantly improved disease-free survival in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and the decreased neurotoxicity indicates that the perioperative approach is more efficient and better tolerated than adjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, the PRODIGE 23 results might change clinical practice.
Funding
Institut National du Cancer, Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, and R&D Unicancer.
Related Questions
Would you recommend additional post-operative chemoradiation for a T2N1 proximal rectal cancer having received adjuvant capecitabine/oxaliplatin?
Pathologic T2N1 after high-quality R0 TME, in an otherwise favorable pelvic risk patient (per pre-op staging MRI) with upper rectal cancer, would not be sufficient for me to recommend post-op CRT as I don’t think there would be a clinically significant benefit that would warrant the known acute and ...
How will the PROSPECT trial presented at ASCO 2023 change your current management of early rectal cancer?
I can’t overstate how much credit the Principal Investigator, Dr. @Dr. First Last, deserves for successfully completing the PROSPECT trial. The oncology community, particularly the radiation oncology community, was concerned that omitting radiation would put patients at risk. It was difficult and ch...
Do you try to incorporate mFOLFIRINOX in total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer?
PRODIGE 23 study is an open-label, randomized phase 3 study (Conroy et al., PMID 33862000). Locally advanced rectal cancer patients (cT3 or cT4 M0) were randomized to either the study arm (mFOLFIRINOX X 3 months, chemoradiation, TME, FOLFOX X 3 months) or the standard arm (chemoradiation followed by...
How would you manage a patient with synchronous locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (T3N2) and a large T2N0 adenocarcinoma of mid and distal esophagus?
A tough situation no doubt. Def need an MDT agreement with medical oncology and surgery. The patient should be evaluated for surgical (especially esophageal resectability). I am going to try to be creative here : I would vote 5x5 to rectal mass then get on mFOLFOX6 based chemo per CALGB 80803 trial...
What is the optimal time to wait prior to surgery following radiation therapy for rectal cancer to maximize the pathologic complete response rate?
Great question- and this is an even more interesting question in the era of TNT, with variables of SC vs LC RT and sequencing of induction vs consolidation chemotherapy. Especially with the question of—how do we best maximize the chance of a pathCR? I think starting with that question is the first s...
For locally advanced rectal cancer, would you consider utilizing the RAPIDO trial approach of short course radiation followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgery?
RAPIDO trial is an important study since it is the first phase III study that reported final results of a total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) approach for rectal cancer.The RAPIDO study is a European study and we need to be aware of the practice difference (in the US, we traditionally use neoadjuvant ...