Mednet Logo

Abstract

Background

Niraparib is an oral poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) 1/2 inhibitor that has shown clinical activity in patients with ovarian cancer. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of niraparib versus placebo as maintenance treatment for patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer.

Methods

In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial, patients were categorized according to the presence or absence of a germline BRCA mutation (gBRCA cohort and non-gBRCA cohort) and the type of non-gBRCA mutation and were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive niraparib (300 mg) or placebo once daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival.

Results

Of 553 enrolled patients, 203 were in the gBRCA cohort (with 138 assigned to niraparib and 65 to placebo), and 350 patients were in the non-gBRCA cohort (with 234 assigned to niraparib and 116 to placebo). Patients in the niraparib group had a significantly longer median duration of progression-free survival than did those in the placebo group, including 21.0 vs. 5.5 months in the gBRCA cohort (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17 to 0.41), as compared with 12.9 months vs. 3.8 months in the non-gBRCA cohort for patients who had tumors with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.59) and 9.3 months vs. 3.9 months in the overall non-gBRCA cohort (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.61; P<0.001 for all three comparisons). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events that were reported in the niraparib group were thrombocytopenia (in 33.8%), anemia (in 25.3%), and neutropenia (in 19.6%), which were managed with dose modifications.

Conclusions

Among patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer, the median duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer among those receiving niraparib than among those receiving placebo, regardless of the presence or absence of gBRCA mutations or HRD status, with moderate bone marrow toxicity. (Funded by Tesaro; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01847274 .).

Related Questions

What is your general approach to PARPi usage in the front-line and recurrent ovarian cancer setting in light of FDA label changes over the years?

2
1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Gynecologic Oncology · Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

In the frontline setting, I generally recommend PARP inhibition with olaparib x2 years for BRCAmut patients (1) and with niraparib x2-3 years for patients with HR-deficient tumors (I personally tend to do 2 years, based on SOLO1 data with olaparib) (2). For BRCAwt patients with HR-proficient tumors...

How do you counsel patients with homologous recombination repair proficient tumors already on niraparib maintenance therapy, prior to the FDA restriction?

2 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Gynecologic Oncology · Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

In the NOVA trial, the PFS benefit for the BRCAwt/HRP patient sub-group was approximately 3 months. Given this small improvement in PFS, prior to the FDA restriction, I always had a risk/benefit discussion with patients reviewing this small benefit and whether the benefit outweighs the risks of trea...

Do you offer PARP inhibitor maintenance retreatment of platinum-sensitive, relapsed, high grade serous ovarian cancer in patients who had a complete response to their most recent platinum-based chemo?

2
5 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · University of Utah School of Medicine

For patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer with a partial or complete response to platinum-based chemotherapy, PARP inhibitors niraparib, olaparib, and rucaparib are approved by the FDA for maintenance therapy. These patients were not treated with prior PARP inhibitor therapy in th...

How long would you continue second line maintenance PARP inhibitor in a patient with recurrent stage IV BRCA+ ovarian cancer who had CR and remains NED?

2
6 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · University of Utah School of Medicine

For patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer with a partial or complete response to platinum-based chemotherapy, niraparib, olaparib, and rucaparib are approved by the FDA for maintenance therapy. While PFS outcomes are improved with these agents regardless of BRCA mutation status, t...

Do you recommend bevacizumab in platinum sensitive recurrences of epithelial ovarian cancer?

1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Gynecologic Oncology · Vanderbilt University School of Medicine

Bevacizumab was approved for use in combination with chemotherapy followed by continued bevacizumab maintenance in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer in December 2016. This approval was based on the findings of 2 studies, GOG-213 and the OCEANS trial. Both trials demonstrated ...