Mednet Logo

Abstract

Background

Local excision is an organ-preserving treatment alternative to transabdominal resection for patients with stage I rectal cancer. However, local excision alone is associated with a high risk of local recurrence and inferior survival compared with transabdominal rectal resection. We investigated the oncological and functional outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and local excision for patients with stage T2N0 rectal cancer.

Methods

We did a multi-institutional, single-arm, open-label, non-randomised, phase 2 trial of patients with clinically staged T2N0 distal rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy at 26 American College of Surgeons Oncology Group institutions. Patients with clinical T2N0 rectal adenocarcinoma staged by endorectal ultrasound or endorectal coil MRI, measuring less than 4 cm in greatest diameter, involving less than 40% of the circumference of the rectum, located within 8 cm of the anal verge, and with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of at least 2 were included in the study. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy consisted of capecitabine (original dose 825 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 and 22-35), oxaliplatin (50 mg/m(2) on weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5), and radiation (5 days a week at 1·8 Gy per day for 5 weeks to a dose of 45 Gy, followed by a boost of 9 Gy, for a total dose of 54 Gy) followed by local excision. Because of adverse events during chemoradiotherapy, the dose of capecitabine was reduced to 725 mg/m(2) twice-daily, 5 days per week, for 5 weeks, and the boost of radiation was reduced to 5·4 Gy, for a total dose of 50·4 Gy. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival for all eligible patients (intention-to-treat population) and for patients who completed chemotherapy and radiation, and had ypT0, ypT1, or ypT2 tumours, and negative resection margins (per-protocol group). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00114231.

Findings

Between May 25, 2006, and Oct 22, 2009, 79 eligible patients were recruited to the trial and started neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Two patients had no surgery and one had a total mesorectal excision. Four additional patients completed protocol treatment, but one had a positive margin and three had ypT3 tumours. Thus, the per-protocol population consisted of 72 patients. Median follow-up was 56 months (IQR 46-63) for all patients. The estimated 3-year disease-free survival for the intention-to-treat group was 88·2% (95% CI 81·3-95·8), and for the per-protocol group was 86·9% (79·3-95·3). Of 79 eligible patients, 23 (29%) had grade 3 gastrointestinal adverse events, 12 (15%) had grade 3-4 pain, and 12 (15%) had grade 3-4 haematological adverse events during chemoradiation. Of the 77 patients who had surgery, six (8%) had grade 3 pain, three (4%) had grade 3-4 haemorrhage, and three (4%) had gastrointestinal adverse events.

Interpretation

Although the observed 3-year disease free survival was not as high as anticipated, our data suggest that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by local excision might be considered as an organ-preserving alternative in carefully selected patients with clinically staged T2N0 tumours who refuse, or are not candidates for, transabdominal resection.

Funding

National Cancer Institute and Sanofi-Aventis.

Related Questions

How would you treat an MMR-proficient T2 N0 low-rectal cancer (measuring 2 cm extending 4-6 cm from the anal verge) in a patient who wishes to preserve his sphincter?

1
3 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine

Thanks for the question. I think a multidisciplinary approach is key here. First, I would make sure there is an MRI rectal performed confirming the stage of cancer and also clarify whether the patient would like to have organ preservation approach (not only the sphincter but also the rectum itself)....

Would you be willing to give definitive chemo-radiation and chemotherapy to a MSI-stable T2N0 low lying rectal cancer in a young healthy patient who wants to avoid surgery?

1
2 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Van Elslander Cancer Center

More likely to recommend total neoadjuvant therapy hoping for induction of complete clinical response. In our hands, on average, we are able to conserve the rectum in about 55% of treated patients with excellent rectal function and a regrowth rate of less than 10%. Local excision will not address th...

For patients with cT1-T3 cN0 cM0 mid/low rectal cancer seeking organ preservation, what treatment approach do you recommend?

1
2 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Medical College of Wisconsin

This is an important question; however, the answer is unknown. The key outcome that should be the focal point for the best treatment option, is which treatment strategy results in the most optimal patient reported quality of life and bowel function. Currently, this remains void of prospective, rando...