The New England journal of medicine 2022 Jul 13
Overall Survival with Brentuximab Vedotin in Stage III or IV Hodgkin's Lymphoma.
Abstract
Background
Five-year follow-up in a trial involving patients with previously untreated stage III or IV classic Hodgkin's lymphoma showed long-term progression-free survival benefits with first-line therapy with brentuximab vedotin, a CD30-directed antibody-drug conjugate, plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A+AVD), as compared with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD). A planned interim analysis indicated a potential benefit with regard to overall survival; data from a median of 6 years of follow-up are now available.
Methods
We randomly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive up to six cycles of A+AVD or ABVD. The primary end point, modified progression-free survival, has been reported previously. The key secondary end point was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was also assessed.
Results
A total of 664 patients were assigned to receive A+AVD and 670 to receive ABVD. At a median follow-up of 73.0 months, 39 patients in the A+AVD group and 64 in the ABVD group had died (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40 to 0.88; P = 0.009). The 6-year overall survival estimates were 93.9% (95% CI, 91.6 to 95.5) in the A+AVD group and 89.4% (95% CI, 86.6 to 91.7) in the ABVD group. Progression-free survival was longer with A+AVD than with ABVD (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.86). Fewer patients in the A+AVD group than in the ABVD group received subsequent therapy, including transplantation, and fewer second cancers were reported with A+AVD (in 23 vs. 32 patients). Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was recommended after an increased incidence of febrile neutropenia was observed with A+AVD. More patients had peripheral neuropathy with A+AVD than with ABVD, but most patients in the two groups had resolution or amelioration of the event by the last follow-up.
Conclusions
Patients who received A+AVD for the treatment of stage III or IV Hodgkin's lymphoma had a survival advantage over those who received ABVD. (Funded by Takeda Development Center Americas and Seagen; ECHELON-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01712490; EudraCT number, 2011-005450-60.).
Related Questions
Does the use of A+AVD versus ABVD affect your decision for consolidation RT for bulky Hodgkin lymphoma?
A+AVD is an acceptable regimen for advanced HL based on results from the ECHELON-1 study (Ansell et al., PMID 35830649) showing an improvement in both PFS (82% vs 75% at 6 years) and OS (94% vs 89%) compared with ABVD. Radiation therapy was not incorporated into this study.In advanced HL, regardless...
Is your standard of care for newly diagnosed advanced classical Hodgkin now nivolumab-AVD based on SWOG 1826?
I think the new standard of care for newly diagnosed patients with advanced classical Hodgkins Lymphoma is now nivolumab-AVD based on the early data from SWOG 1826. While we often wait for more mature data, the early improvement in PFS and the more favorable toxicity profile of this regimen over BvA...