Mednet Logo

Abstract

Background

Patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma that progresses after platinum-based chemotherapy have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options.

Methods

In this open-label, international, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 542 patients with advanced urothelial cancer that recurred or progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy to receive pembrolizumab (a highly selective, humanized monoclonal IgG4κ isotype antibody against programmed death 1 [PD-1]) at a dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks or the investigator's choice of chemotherapy with paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinflunine. The coprimary end points were overall survival and progression-free survival, which were assessed among all patients and among patients who had a tumor PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) combined positive score (the percentage of PD-L1-expressing tumor and infiltrating immune cells relative to the total number of tumor cells) of 10% or more.

Results

The median overall survival in the total population was 10.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.0 to 11.8) in the pembrolizumab group, as compared with 7.4 months (95% CI, 6.1 to 8.3) in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for death, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.91; P=0.002). The median overall survival among patients who had a tumor PD-L1 combined positive score of 10% or more was 8.0 months (95% CI, 5.0 to 12.3) in the pembrolizumab group, as compared with 5.2 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 7.4) in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.88; P=0.005). There was no significant between-group difference in the duration of progression-free survival in the total population (hazard ratio for death or disease progression, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.19; P=0.42) or among patients who had a tumor PD-L1 combined positive score of 10% or more (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.28; P=0.24). Fewer treatment-related adverse events of any grade were reported in the pembrolizumab group than in the chemotherapy group (60.9% vs. 90.2%); there were also fewer events of grade 3, 4, or 5 severity reported in the pembrolizumab group than in the chemotherapy group (15.0% vs. 49.4%).

Conclusions

Pembrolizumab was associated with significantly longer overall survival (by approximately 3 months) and with a lower rate of treatment-related adverse events than chemotherapy as second-line therapy for platinum-refractory advanced urothelial carcinoma. (Funded by Merck; KEYNOTE-045 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02256436 .).

Related Questions

Would you offer a patient with pT4 renal urothelial cancer adjuvant RT for a positive margin if re-excision is not possible?

1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · University of New Mexico School of Medicine

Adjuvant radiation therapy for upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma (UTUC) has historically been performed, but is currently not recommended by most cooperative guideline groups (NCCN, European Association of Urology,...). Due to the relative scarcity of this disease, there is no randomized data. L...

Would you prefer FGFR inhibitor or second line immunotherapy in a patient with metastatic urothelial cancer of the bladder with FGFR mutation?

2 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Siri Onclogy and hematology Infusion Service

I would clearly prefer immunotherapy specifically with the use of pembrolizumab. I would measure the PDL1 CPS expression, where the impact is much greater. Phase 3 data clearly shows significantly improved survival compared to chemotherapy or BSC. This is the first positive trial in the second-line ...

How do you choose among the available PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors approved for metastatic bladder cancer?

2
2 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

This is an evolving field. While the thought had been all the drugs were likely equivalent in efficacy (with no head to head trials) this has changed in the past week. Roche had a press release in which they announced the Phase III IMvigor211 study that evaluated atezolizumab in people with locally ...