Lancet (London, England) 2023 Oct 20
Pembrolizumab plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy for HER2-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: interim analyses from the phase 3 KEYNOTE-811 randomised placebo-controlled trial.
Abstract
Background
Evidence for the efficacy of combined PD-1 and HER2 blockade with chemotherapy on progression-free and overall survival in HER2-positive gastro-oesophageal cancer is scarce. The first interim analysis of the randomised, phase 3 KEYNOTE-811 study showed a superior objective response with pembrolizumab compared with placebo when added to trastuzumab plus fluoropyrimidine and platinum-based chemotherapy. Here, we report results from protocol-specified subsequent interim analyses of KEYNOTE-811.
Methods
The randomised, phase 3 KEYNOTE-811 trial involved 168 medical centres in 20 countries worldwide. Patients aged 18 years or older with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-positive gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, without previous first-line treatment, were randomly assigned (1:1) by an integrated interactive voice-response and web-response system to intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo, both to be combined with standard chemotherapy (fluoropyrimidine and platinum-based therapy) plus trastuzumab every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles or until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or investigator or participant-initiated withdrawal. Randomisation used a block size of four and was stratified by region, PD-L1 status, and chemotherapy. Dual primary endpoints were progression-free and overall survival, analysed by intention to treat. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment according to the treatment received. KEYNOTE-811 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03615326) and is active but not recruiting.
Findings
Between Oct 5, 2018, and Aug 6, 2021, 698 patients were assigned to pembrolizumab (n=350) or placebo (n=348). 564 (81%) were male and 134 (19%) were female. At the third interim analysis, 286 (82%) of 350 patients in the pembrolizumab group and 304 (88%) of 346 in the placebo group who received treatment had discontinued treatment, mostly due to disease progression. At the second interim analysis (median follow-up 28·3 months [IQR 19·4-34·3] in the pembrolizumab group and 28·5 months [20·1-34·3] in the placebo group), median progression-free survival was 10·0 months (95% CI 8·6-11·7) in the pembrolizumab group versus 8·1 months (7·0-8·5) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·72, 95% CI 0·60-0·87; p=0·0002). Median overall survival was 20·0 months (17·8-23·2) versus 16·9 months (15·0-19·8; HR 0·87 [0·72-1·06]; p=0·084). At the third interim analysis (median follow-up 38·4 months [IQR 29·5-44·4] in the pembrolizumab group and 38·6 months [30·2-44·4] in the placebo group), median progression-free survival was 10·0 months (8·6-12·2) versus 8·1 months (7·1-8·6; HR 0·73 [0·61-0·87]), and median overall survival was 20·0 months (17·8-22·1) versus 16·8 months (15·0-18·7; HR 0·84 [0·70-1·01]), but did not meet prespecified criteria for significance and will continue to final analysis. Grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events occurred in 204 (58%) of 350 patients in the pembrolizumab group versus 176 (51%) of 346 patients in the placebo group. Treatment-related adverse events that led to death occurred in four (1%) patients in the pembrolizumab group and three (1%) in the placebo group. The most common treatment-related adverse events of any grade were diarrhoea (165 [47%] in the pembrolizumab group vs 145 [42%] in the placebo group), nausea (154 [44%] vs 152 [44%]), and anaemia (109 [31%] vs 113 [33%]).
Interpretation
Compared with placebo, pembrolizumab significantly improved progression-free survival when combined with first-line trastuzumab and chemotherapy for metastatic HER2-positive gastro-oesophageal cancer, specifically in patients with tumours with a PD-L1 combined positive score of 1 or more. Overall survival follow-up is ongoing and will be reported at the final analysis.
Funding
Merck Sharp & Dohme.
Related Questions
What are your top takeaways from ASCO GI 2026?
GLP1 agonist use is associated with improved outcomes for colorectal cancer in a retrospective United States study. Now we need to incorporate this into randomized trials. I think this also provides more evidence that metabolic syndrome type issues may help explain early-onset colorectal cancers. W...
What is the preferred second-line therapy for HER2-positive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who have progressed on first line Trastuzumab and Immunotherapy?
I'm assuming we are talking about HER2+ esophageal adenocarcinoma? If that's the case, 2L T-DXd is the way to go. After confirmation of persistent HER2 expression (ctDNA showing positive amplification or rebiopsy with IHC). DESTINY-Gastric04 confirmed the superiority of T-DXd over PAC/RAM in 2L.If y...
In a patient with HER2+ advanced endometrial cancer, do you include IO(+/- olaparib) in their treatment regimen, or only trastuzumab in addition to carboplatin/paclitaxel?
This is a data-free zone and an excellent question. We don't yet know the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in pMMR, HER2-positive, p53 mutated tumors, although the ad hoc RUBY data presented at ESMO suggest that p53 mutated tumors are responsive to immunotherapy. I eagerly await the histolog...
What is your preferred first-line treatment for metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma that is PD-L1 CPS ≥ 10 and also HER2+?
We all need to work together and bring the KEYNOTE-811 regimen to the neoadjuvant setting for HER2+ gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma patients. Giving FLOT4 to HER2+ gastric or GEJ carcinoma patients doesn't make much sense in the post-KN-811 era... but we need data.