Mednet Logo

Abstract

Background

The anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) humanized monoclonal antibody trastuzumab improves the outcome in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. However, most cases of advanced disease eventually progress. Pertuzumab, an anti-HER2 humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits receptor dimerization, has a mechanism of action that is complementary to that of trastuzumab, and combination therapy with the two antibodies has shown promising activity and an acceptable safety profile in phase 2 studies involving patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Methods

We randomly assigned 808 patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer to receive placebo plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel (control group) or pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel (pertuzumab group) as first-line treatment until the time of disease progression or the development of toxic effects that could not be effectively managed. The primary end point was independently assessed progression-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, progression-free survival as assessed by the investigator, the objective response rate, and safety.

Results

The median progression-free survival was 12.4 months in the control group, as compared with 18.5 months in the pertuzumab group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.51 to 0.75; P<0.001). The interim analysis of overall survival showed a strong trend in favor of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel. The safety profile was generally similar in the two groups, with no increase in left ventricular systolic dysfunction; the rates of febrile neutropenia and diarrhea of grade 3 or above were higher in the pertuzumab group than in the control group.

Conclusions

The combination of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel, as compared with placebo plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel, when used as first-line treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, significantly prolonged progression-free survival, with no increase in cardiac toxic effects. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00567190.).

Related Questions

How do you utilize CDK 4/6 inhibitors in metastatic ER+ HER2+ breast cancer?

1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

The benefit of adding a CDK4/6 inhibitor to the arsenal of treatment options in the hormone receptor (HR) and HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer setting is unknown. We are trying to answer this question through clinical trials, such as the multi-center Randomized, Open Label, Clinical Study of t...

How do you approach a BRCA-mutated, premenopausal woman with metastatic ER+, Her2+ carcinoma with progression on THP?

1
2 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Private Practice and Digital Health

This is probably not a common scenario, but one that theoretically crosses 3 areas of metastatic disease with largely non overlapping clinical trial data. It is somewhat unusual because premenopausal women with ER-positive/HER2 positive breast cancer have disease that is typically sensitive to estro...

When do you consider HER2-targeting antibody drug conjugates in the first line setting for metastatic HER2 positive, ER negative breast cancer?

3
5 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

This question cannot be answered for any specific situation with a high degree of reliability without a controlled clinical trial. In my opinion, there could be situations in which I would predict a favorable benefit/risk ratio to the use of T-DXd in first line as opposed to standard taxane + trastu...