New: NCI-funded clinical trial search
Mednet Logo

Abstract

Purpose

To report the results of a prospective randomized trial comparing a daily versus weekly boost to the tumor cavity during the course of accelerated radiation to the breast with patients in the prone position.

Methods and materials

From 2009 to 2012, 400 patients with stage 0 to II breast cancer who had undergone segmental mastectomy participated in an institutional review board-approved trial testing prone breast radiation therapy to 40.5 Gy in 15 fractions 5 d/wk to the whole breast, after randomization to a concomitant daily boost to the tumor bed of 0.5 Gy, or a weekly boost of 2 Gy, on Friday. The present noninferiority trial tested the primary hypothesis that a weekly boost produced no more acute toxicity than did a daily boost. The recurrence-free survival was estimated for both treatment arms using the Kaplan-Meier method; the relative risk of recurrence or death was estimated, and the 2 arms were compared using the log-rank test.

Results

At a median follow-up period of 45 months, no deaths related to breast cancer had occurred. The weekly boost regimen produced no more grade ≥2 acute toxicity than did the daily boost regimen (8.1% vs 10.4%; noninferiority Z = -2.52; P=.006). No statistically significant difference was found in the cumulative incidence of long-term fibrosis or telangiectasia of grade ≥2 between the 2 arms (log-rank P=.923). Two local and two distant recurrences developed in the daily treatment arm and three local and one distant developed in the weekly arm. The 4-year recurrence-free survival rate was not different between the 2 treatment arms (98% for both arms).

Conclusions

A tumor bed boost delivered either daily or weekly was tolerated similarly during accelerated prone breast radiation therapy, with excellent control of disease and comparable cosmetic results.

Related Questions

Do you always use the same CTV and PTV expansions when defining fields for lumpectomy bed boost?

2
3 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Varian Medical Systems/Allegheny health network

If using electron beams, we expand by 2 to 2.5 cm (based on electron energy) around the lumpectomy cavity. If using photons, then we use 1 cm for CTV and 3 mm for PTV.

Would you recommend a simultaneous integrated boost with hypofractionated whole breast radiation?

1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · New York University School of Medicine

With the presentation of IMPORT HIGH trial (CRUK/06/003) at SABCS last month, the data for simultaneous integrated boost SIB in breast cancer is accumulating. This was a phase III trial that randomized 2,617 women to a sequential boost (50Gy +16Gy), SIB arm (40Gy to breast with 48 Gy to boost volume...

Would you ever recommend a breast boost using BID fractionation due to patient scheduling?

2
3 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · New York University School of Medicine

We don't usually give the breast boost BID (due to patient scheduling or other reasons) but we will deliver a daily concomitant boost (270cGy to whole breast with simultaneous integrated daily boost of 320cGy to tumor bed for total dose of 4050cGy to whole breast and 4800cGy to tumor bed) as per our...

When giving a breast boost, what are indications for a photon breast boost?

4
2 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Varian Medical Systems/Allegheny health network

In general, once the surgical cavity depth approaches 5 cm then it is harder to cover with electrons. That being said, for these patients with disease in the outer quadrant, the lateral decubitus position helps significantly to bring the cavity close to the surface. We published this data: http://ww...